Discussion:
"Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
(too old to reply)
The Starmaker
2008-06-28 20:10:31 UTC
Permalink
Loading Image...
Loading Image...


The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.


You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!

You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.

I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?

Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.


The Starmaker
RichA
2008-06-29 02:54:20 UTC
Permalink
Loading Image...
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
And "Silent Running."
David Johnston
2008-06-29 05:08:12 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:10:31 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head.
So where you come from they're deranged thugs are they?
The Starmaker
2008-06-29 19:53:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:10:31 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head.
So where you come from they're deranged thugs are they?
I don't know. Probably some might be. What difference does it make?

They are, ...efficient.

You people get upset if somebody goes into your home and steals your
TV set. You probably want to kill him too! But a guy like "Andrew
Stanton", steals millions from you and you let him go. That's
deranged.
And it's not like it's the first time he stole intellectual property.
He's done it before...

Isn't that called "grand theft" or grand larceny?

I know you people just look the other way...
Rich Billionaire
2008-06-29 20:08:05 UTC
Permalink
What you guys don't understand is that taking inspiration from others
and building on top of what they created while adding your own ideas
is an essential part of the creative process. And there is nothing
wrong with it! It's wrong to think that every creative product must be
100% original. Many artists try to make something 100% original and
they end up creating some bizarre, ridiculous crap. You HAVE to learn
from others if you want to be great and to make worthwhile creations.
Copying is the best way to learn. The great master painters of the
past learned by copying the paintings of other masters and went on to
make great new art of their own. But when the modern artists came
along, they decided not to copy anyone and to try to do everything
100% different and original. They ended up making utter crap as a
result.
Skipper
2008-06-29 20:47:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rich Billionaire
What you guys don't understand is that taking inspiration from others
and building on top of what they created while adding your own ideas
is an essential part of the creative process. And there is nothing
wrong with it! It's wrong to think that every creative product must be
100% original. Many artists try to make something 100% original and
they end up creating some bizarre, ridiculous crap. You HAVE to learn
from others if you want to be great and to make worthwhile creations.
Copying is the best way to learn. The great master painters of the
past learned by copying the paintings of other masters and went on to
make great new art of their own. But when the modern artists came
along, they decided not to copy anyone and to try to do everything
100% different and original. They ended up making utter crap as a
result.
The Beatles made hits of redos of old rock and roll hits in the
beginning.

I cut the reply to only relevant groups.
The Starmaker
2008-06-30 00:29:32 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:08:05 -0700, Rich Billionaire
Post by Rich Billionaire
What you guys don't understand is that taking inspiration from others
and building on top of what they created while adding your own ideas
is an essential part of the creative process. And there is nothing
wrong with it! It's wrong to think that every creative product must be
100% original. Many artists try to make something 100% original and
they end up creating some bizarre, ridiculous crap. You HAVE to learn
from others if you want to be great and to make worthwhile creations.
Copying is the best way to learn. The great master painters of the
past learned by copying the paintings of other masters and went on to
make great new art of their own. But when the modern artists came
along, they decided not to copy anyone and to try to do everything
100% different and original. They ended up making utter crap as a
result.
"inspiration from others"...I like that line. "Inspired by" , try
THEAFT!

Here's a small sample below of your so-called "inspiration from
others"...

Alonzo Douglas v. Sony. Writer who submitted script titled “Anaconda”
to Sony says the new film of that name is based o his script.

“Clockstoppers”


Santa Fe Entertainment v. Paramount Pictures. The owners of a motion
picture screenplay “It’s About Time” claim that Paramount Pictures
copied without authorization all aspects of their script in its
creation of the film “Clockstoppers.”


Patrick brothers v. Murphy. Pair of scriptwriters say their script was
the basis of hit film, "The Nutty Professor."


Tony Anthony, Howard Worth v. Universal, MCA. Two writers say
“Daylight” was based on their script, “The Tunnel.”


Lite Stone Entertainment v. DEJ Productions, Roses and Guns
Productions, et al. The owner of the motion picture screenplay
“Jessie’s Girl” claims the producers of the movie “Gang of Roses”
copied the plot and characters of the screenplay to create their movie

Donald Tavey v. Pierce Brosnan, Irish Dream Time. Writer says the
upcoming Brosnan film "The Nephew" bears "shocking similarities" to
his own "Wild Nights in Castleberry."


Chase-Riboud v. Dreamworks. Author alleges that film "Amistad" is
based on her book about the same historical incident.


Diane Johnson v. Mathieu Kassovitz. Writer alleges "Café Au Lait" is
based on her script.


Waid v. Disney. Former USN sub captain says his script was the basis
for Crimson Tide.


Hines, Jones v. Universal. Two writers say the script for “Dante’s
Peak “ was copied from a script they submitted in 1995


Laskay v. New Line, American Zoetrope. Writer who bought English
language rights to "Man Facing Southeast" says studios stole concept
and script.


Butler v. Wimmer. Writer sues collaborator who allegedly took
unfinished, co-written script, reworked it and sold it for own
benefit.


Michael Fry v. Estate of Sagan. Writer says he pitched script to son
of Carl Sagan, who sold similar script to 20th Century Fox.


Bernstein and Petersen v. Universal. Screenwriters allege the film
"Half-Baked" was based on their script.


Chapin v. Kushner-Locke. Writer says KL fraudulently induced him to
sign away his rights to a script called "Cutthroat."


Bloom v. Ferguson. Screenwriter accuses writer of “Maximum Risk” of
plagiarising from his script, “Chain Reaction.”


Margaret McKenzie v. Paramount et al. The film “Lucky Numbers”
infringes on the plaintiff’s screenplay “Money Trouble,” suit alleges


Glenn Willis v. Disney. Among other similarities, three-year gestation
period for giant cockroaches is evidence Disney copied script
submitted with internship application in making "Mimic," writer
alleges


Masters v. Sony. A writer says the movie "Money Train" is based on the
screenplay Sony optioned from him in 1988.


Dennis Manuel v. New Line Cinema. New York writer, representing
himself, alleges that both "The Long Kiss Goodbye" and "Seven"
infringe on the same script, which he wrote in 1978-1980


Nick Villiers v. Eric Fellner et al. Writer says long-time friend and
producer used his ideas for a movie to be called "Cheeks" as part of
the hit "Notting Hill."


Gary Compton v. Disney, Bruckheimer, Bay et al. Author says “Pearl
Harbor” infringes on his romantic screenplay “Pearl Harbor Love.”


Linda Lukens v. Paramount Pictures et al. Series "Queen of Swords" is
based on scripts by plaintiff, but were made with neither permission
nor credit.


Grosso v. Miramax. Writers alleges the film "Rounders" was made from
his script, but he was never paid.


Faye Kellerman v. Miramax, Universal. Bestselling author alleges
"Shakespeare in Love" is based on her 1989 novel "The Quality of
Mercy."


Elena Mareno v. Miramax et al. New York woman alleges "White Man's
Burden" is based on her treatment and screenplay


Newsom v. Columbia Pictures. Author of 1985 “Spider-Man” script says
his material was used
in hit 2002 “Spider-Man” movie without credit or payment.

N. Barry Carver v. Paramount. Writer says the similarities of "Star
Trek: First Contact" to the script
"A Stitch in Time," which he submitted to Paramount in 1991, are
"bizarrely striking."


Mattson v. Protosevich, New Line. Writer says his idea and screenplay
for a movie about a female therapist entering the mind of a comatose
patient were used to make "The Cell."


Michael Alan Eddy v. Radar Pictures, Interscope, Warner Bros., WGA.
Writer who says he was first of six to work on “The Last Samurai”
claims the film’s producers
and the WGA prevented him from receiving the proper credit due to him
the other early writers
for their work on the project.


Mowry v. Scott Rudin, Viacom. Writer alleges that the movie “The
Truman Show”
is so similar to the screenplay he submitted to the defendants that it
must have been copied.


James Bass v. Lions Gate, Mandalay, Snoop Dogg.
Music video and commercial producer says rapper and film companies
based film “The Wash” on his script.


Howard, Beutler, Schlossberg-Cohen v. Danjaq et al. Baltimore
scriptwriters claim
latest Bond flick copied their script "Currency of Fear." We print
description of similarities in full.


Vicky Rocco v. Tamasy, Bell. Writer says her script was ripped off for
the new movie, "Walking Across Egypt."


Siemion v. NBC. Screenwriter claims that his idea for a reality show
touted as “American Idol meets The World of Boxing,” was knocked out
of
his grasp by industry heavyweights and presented to television
audiences
as “The Contender.”

TJ Johnson v. MGM. Writer believes that “Barbershop” infringes on his
original story about a Southside Chicago Barbershop. New Filing CD
California.


Bethea v. Burnett. Would-be reality show producer says “The
Apprentice”
was copied from his proposal for a series called “C.E.O.” starring
Donald Trump.


for more "inspirations from others"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.acting/browse_thread/thread/d76db482592448e1/b05702397b7af825?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=that+practicaly+never+happens#b05702397b7af825
The Starmaker
2008-06-30 05:52:24 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:29:32 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:08:05 -0700, Rich Billionaire
Post by Rich Billionaire
What you guys don't understand is that taking inspiration from others
and building on top of what they created while adding your own ideas
is an essential part of the creative process. And there is nothing
wrong with it! It's wrong to think that every creative product must be
100% original. Many artists try to make something 100% original and
they end up creating some bizarre, ridiculous crap. You HAVE to learn
from others if you want to be great and to make worthwhile creations.
Copying is the best way to learn. The great master painters of the
past learned by copying the paintings of other masters and went on to
make great new art of their own. But when the modern artists came
along, they decided not to copy anyone and to try to do everything
100% different and original. They ended up making utter crap as a
result.
"inspiration from others"...I like that line. "Inspired by" , try
THEAFT!
Here's a small sample below of your so-called "inspiration from
others"...
Alonzo Douglas v. Sony. Writer who submitted script titled “Anaconda”
to Sony says the new film of that name is based o his script.
“Clockstoppers”
Santa Fe Entertainment v. Paramount Pictures. The owners of a motion
picture screenplay “It’s About Time” claim that Paramount Pictures
copied without authorization all aspects of their script in its
creation of the film “Clockstoppers.”
Patrick brothers v. Murphy. Pair of scriptwriters say their script was
the basis of hit film, "The Nutty Professor."
Tony Anthony, Howard Worth v. Universal, MCA. Two writers say
“Daylight” was based on their script, “The Tunnel.”
Lite Stone Entertainment v. DEJ Productions, Roses and Guns
Productions, et al. The owner of the motion picture screenplay
“Jessie’s Girl” claims the producers of the movie “Gang of Roses”
copied the plot and characters of the screenplay to create their movie
Donald Tavey v. Pierce Brosnan, Irish Dream Time. Writer says the
upcoming Brosnan film "The Nephew" bears "shocking similarities" to
his own "Wild Nights in Castleberry."
Chase-Riboud v. Dreamworks. Author alleges that film "Amistad" is
based on her book about the same historical incident.
Diane Johnson v. Mathieu Kassovitz. Writer alleges "Café Au Lait" is
based on her script.
Waid v. Disney. Former USN sub captain says his script was the basis
for Crimson Tide.
Hines, Jones v. Universal. Two writers say the script for “Dante’s
Peak “ was copied from a script they submitted in 1995
Laskay v. New Line, American Zoetrope. Writer who bought English
language rights to "Man Facing Southeast" says studios stole concept
and script.
Butler v. Wimmer. Writer sues collaborator who allegedly took
unfinished, co-written script, reworked it and sold it for own
benefit.
Michael Fry v. Estate of Sagan. Writer says he pitched script to son
of Carl Sagan, who sold similar script to 20th Century Fox.
Bernstein and Petersen v. Universal. Screenwriters allege the film
"Half-Baked" was based on their script.
Chapin v. Kushner-Locke. Writer says KL fraudulently induced him to
sign away his rights to a script called "Cutthroat."
Bloom v. Ferguson. Screenwriter accuses writer of “Maximum Risk” of
plagiarising from his script, “Chain Reaction.”
Margaret McKenzie v. Paramount et al. The film “Lucky Numbers”
infringes on the plaintiff’s screenplay “Money Trouble,” suit alleges
Glenn Willis v. Disney. Among other similarities, three-year gestation
period for giant cockroaches is evidence Disney copied script
submitted with internship application in making "Mimic," writer
alleges
Masters v. Sony. A writer says the movie "Money Train" is based on the
screenplay Sony optioned from him in 1988.
Dennis Manuel v. New Line Cinema. New York writer, representing
himself, alleges that both "The Long Kiss Goodbye" and "Seven"
infringe on the same script, which he wrote in 1978-1980
Nick Villiers v. Eric Fellner et al. Writer says long-time friend and
producer used his ideas for a movie to be called "Cheeks" as part of
the hit "Notting Hill."
Gary Compton v. Disney, Bruckheimer, Bay et al. Author says “Pearl
Harbor” infringes on his romantic screenplay “Pearl Harbor Love.”
Linda Lukens v. Paramount Pictures et al. Series "Queen of Swords" is
based on scripts by plaintiff, but were made with neither permission
nor credit.
Grosso v. Miramax. Writers alleges the film "Rounders" was made from
his script, but he was never paid.
Faye Kellerman v. Miramax, Universal. Bestselling author alleges
"Shakespeare in Love" is based on her 1989 novel "The Quality of
Mercy."
Elena Mareno v. Miramax et al. New York woman alleges "White Man's
Burden" is based on her treatment and screenplay
Newsom v. Columbia Pictures. Author of 1985 “Spider-Man” script says
his material was used
in hit 2002 “Spider-Man” movie without credit or payment.
N. Barry Carver v. Paramount. Writer says the similarities of "Star
Trek: First Contact" to the script
"A Stitch in Time," which he submitted to Paramount in 1991, are
"bizarrely striking."
Mattson v. Protosevich, New Line. Writer says his idea and screenplay
for a movie about a female therapist entering the mind of a comatose
patient were used to make "The Cell."
Michael Alan Eddy v. Radar Pictures, Interscope, Warner Bros., WGA.
Writer who says he was first of six to work on “The Last Samurai”
claims the film’s producers
and the WGA prevented him from receiving the proper credit due to him
the other early writers
for their work on the project.
Mowry v. Scott Rudin, Viacom. Writer alleges that the movie “The
Truman Show”
is so similar to the screenplay he submitted to the defendants that it
must have been copied.
James Bass v. Lions Gate, Mandalay, Snoop Dogg.
Music video and commercial producer says rapper and film companies
based film “The Wash” on his script.
Howard, Beutler, Schlossberg-Cohen v. Danjaq et al. Baltimore
scriptwriters claim
latest Bond flick copied their script "Currency of Fear." We print
description of similarities in full.
Vicky Rocco v. Tamasy, Bell. Writer says her script was ripped off for
the new movie, "Walking Across Egypt."
Siemion v. NBC. Screenwriter claims that his idea for a reality show
touted as “American Idol meets The World of Boxing,” was knocked out
of
his grasp by industry heavyweights and presented to television
audiences
as “The Contender.”
TJ Johnson v. MGM. Writer believes that “Barbershop” infringes on his
original story about a Southside Chicago Barbershop. New Filing CD
California.
Bethea v. Burnett. Would-be reality show producer says “The
Apprentice”
was copied from his proposal for a series called “C.E.O.” starring
Donald Trump.
for more "inspirations from others"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.acting/browse_thread/thread/d76db482592448e1/b05702397b7af825?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=that+practicaly+never+happens#b05702397b7af825
DreamWorks Sued For Stealing “Madagascar”

In a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by a professional South
Florida illustrator, Joseph Davis, the artist alleges he sketched
characters and wrote a story in 1999 and later sent it to DreamWorks
for consideration, after being introduced to an executive from the
company by his aunt.

May 16, 2008 - A professional illustrator from South Florida who says
he created a story about animals who escape from New York City’s
Central Park Zoo has sued Dreamworks Animation SKG, claiming the
studio’s 2005 film Madagascar amounts to copyright infringement.

In his lawsuit filed Tuesday in federal court, Joseph Davis of Boca
Raton said he used his signature style of animation in 1999 to
illustrate his Animals Night Out story about four zoo animals who
undergo “a series of misadventures” in New York.

Davis’ aunt introduced him to a Dreamworks executive, who after
receiving the original version of his story, indicated the Glendale,
Calif., studio was not interested in a business relationship with
Davis, according to the lawsuit.

Six years later, the animated children’s film Madagascar premiered in
theaters.

-------------------------------------------------------------
The Starmaker
2008-06-30 06:23:47 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:52:24 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 17:29:32 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:08:05 -0700, Rich Billionaire
Post by Rich Billionaire
What you guys don't understand is that taking inspiration from others
and building on top of what they created while adding your own ideas
is an essential part of the creative process. And there is nothing
wrong with it! It's wrong to think that every creative product must be
100% original. Many artists try to make something 100% original and
they end up creating some bizarre, ridiculous crap. You HAVE to learn
from others if you want to be great and to make worthwhile creations.
Copying is the best way to learn. The great master painters of the
past learned by copying the paintings of other masters and went on to
make great new art of their own. But when the modern artists came
along, they decided not to copy anyone and to try to do everything
100% different and original. They ended up making utter crap as a
result.
"inspiration from others"...I like that line. "Inspired by" , try
THEAFT!
Here's a small sample below of your so-called "inspiration from
others"...
Alonzo Douglas v. Sony. Writer who submitted script titled “Anaconda”
to Sony says the new film of that name is based o his script.
“Clockstoppers”
Santa Fe Entertainment v. Paramount Pictures. The owners of a motion
picture screenplay “It’s About Time” claim that Paramount Pictures
copied without authorization all aspects of their script in its
creation of the film “Clockstoppers.”
Patrick brothers v. Murphy. Pair of scriptwriters say their script was
the basis of hit film, "The Nutty Professor."
Tony Anthony, Howard Worth v. Universal, MCA. Two writers say
“Daylight” was based on their script, “The Tunnel.”
Lite Stone Entertainment v. DEJ Productions, Roses and Guns
Productions, et al. The owner of the motion picture screenplay
“Jessie’s Girl” claims the producers of the movie “Gang of Roses”
copied the plot and characters of the screenplay to create their movie
Donald Tavey v. Pierce Brosnan, Irish Dream Time. Writer says the
upcoming Brosnan film "The Nephew" bears "shocking similarities" to
his own "Wild Nights in Castleberry."
Chase-Riboud v. Dreamworks. Author alleges that film "Amistad" is
based on her book about the same historical incident.
Diane Johnson v. Mathieu Kassovitz. Writer alleges "Café Au Lait" is
based on her script.
Waid v. Disney. Former USN sub captain says his script was the basis
for Crimson Tide.
Hines, Jones v. Universal. Two writers say the script for “Dante’s
Peak “ was copied from a script they submitted in 1995
Laskay v. New Line, American Zoetrope. Writer who bought English
language rights to "Man Facing Southeast" says studios stole concept
and script.
Butler v. Wimmer. Writer sues collaborator who allegedly took
unfinished, co-written script, reworked it and sold it for own
benefit.
Michael Fry v. Estate of Sagan. Writer says he pitched script to son
of Carl Sagan, who sold similar script to 20th Century Fox.
Bernstein and Petersen v. Universal. Screenwriters allege the film
"Half-Baked" was based on their script.
Chapin v. Kushner-Locke. Writer says KL fraudulently induced him to
sign away his rights to a script called "Cutthroat."
Bloom v. Ferguson. Screenwriter accuses writer of “Maximum Risk” of
plagiarising from his script, “Chain Reaction.”
Margaret McKenzie v. Paramount et al. The film “Lucky Numbers”
infringes on the plaintiff’s screenplay “Money Trouble,” suit alleges
Glenn Willis v. Disney. Among other similarities, three-year gestation
period for giant cockroaches is evidence Disney copied script
submitted with internship application in making "Mimic," writer
alleges
Masters v. Sony. A writer says the movie "Money Train" is based on the
screenplay Sony optioned from him in 1988.
Dennis Manuel v. New Line Cinema. New York writer, representing
himself, alleges that both "The Long Kiss Goodbye" and "Seven"
infringe on the same script, which he wrote in 1978-1980
Nick Villiers v. Eric Fellner et al. Writer says long-time friend and
producer used his ideas for a movie to be called "Cheeks" as part of
the hit "Notting Hill."
Gary Compton v. Disney, Bruckheimer, Bay et al. Author says “Pearl
Harbor” infringes on his romantic screenplay “Pearl Harbor Love.”
Linda Lukens v. Paramount Pictures et al. Series "Queen of Swords" is
based on scripts by plaintiff, but were made with neither permission
nor credit.
Grosso v. Miramax. Writers alleges the film "Rounders" was made from
his script, but he was never paid.
Faye Kellerman v. Miramax, Universal. Bestselling author alleges
"Shakespeare in Love" is based on her 1989 novel "The Quality of
Mercy."
Elena Mareno v. Miramax et al. New York woman alleges "White Man's
Burden" is based on her treatment and screenplay
Newsom v. Columbia Pictures. Author of 1985 “Spider-Man” script says
his material was used
in hit 2002 “Spider-Man” movie without credit or payment.
N. Barry Carver v. Paramount. Writer says the similarities of "Star
Trek: First Contact" to the script
"A Stitch in Time," which he submitted to Paramount in 1991, are
"bizarrely striking."
Mattson v. Protosevich, New Line. Writer says his idea and screenplay
for a movie about a female therapist entering the mind of a comatose
patient were used to make "The Cell."
Michael Alan Eddy v. Radar Pictures, Interscope, Warner Bros., WGA.
Writer who says he was first of six to work on “The Last Samurai”
claims the film’s producers
and the WGA prevented him from receiving the proper credit due to him
the other early writers
for their work on the project.
Mowry v. Scott Rudin, Viacom. Writer alleges that the movie “The
Truman Show”
is so similar to the screenplay he submitted to the defendants that it
must have been copied.
James Bass v. Lions Gate, Mandalay, Snoop Dogg.
Music video and commercial producer says rapper and film companies
based film “The Wash” on his script.
Howard, Beutler, Schlossberg-Cohen v. Danjaq et al. Baltimore
scriptwriters claim
latest Bond flick copied their script "Currency of Fear." We print
description of similarities in full.
Vicky Rocco v. Tamasy, Bell. Writer says her script was ripped off for
the new movie, "Walking Across Egypt."
Siemion v. NBC. Screenwriter claims that his idea for a reality show
touted as “American Idol meets The World of Boxing,” was knocked out
of
his grasp by industry heavyweights and presented to television
audiences
as “The Contender.”
TJ Johnson v. MGM. Writer believes that “Barbershop” infringes on his
original story about a Southside Chicago Barbershop. New Filing CD
California.
Bethea v. Burnett. Would-be reality show producer says “The
Apprentice”
was copied from his proposal for a series called “C.E.O.” starring
Donald Trump.
for more "inspirations from others"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.acting/browse_thread/thread/d76db482592448e1/b05702397b7af825?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=that+practicaly+never+happens#b05702397b7af825
DreamWorks Sued For Stealing “Madagascar”
In a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by a professional South
Florida illustrator, Joseph Davis, the artist alleges he sketched
characters and wrote a story in 1999 and later sent it to DreamWorks
for consideration, after being introduced to an executive from the
company by his aunt.
May 16, 2008 - A professional illustrator from South Florida who says
he created a story about animals who escape from New York City’s
Central Park Zoo has sued Dreamworks Animation SKG, claiming the
studio’s 2005 film Madagascar amounts to copyright infringement.
In his lawsuit filed Tuesday in federal court, Joseph Davis of Boca
Raton said he used his signature style of animation in 1999 to
illustrate his Animals Night Out story about four zoo animals who
undergo “a series of misadventures” in New York.
Davis’ aunt introduced him to a Dreamworks executive, who after
receiving the original version of his story, indicated the Glendale,
Calif., studio was not interested in a business relationship with
Davis, according to the lawsuit.
Six years later, the animated children’s film Madagascar premiered in
theaters.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Looks to me, everything Pixar did was stolen.

---
Stanley Miller v. Pixar Animation Studios et al.
Argued December 13, 15, 2006.
Decided December 20, 2006.





Stanley Miller claims that "Mike" and "Sullivan, the two main
monster-buddies in the Disney/Pixar movie "Monster's Inc." were
derived from a little one-eyed creature and a larger monster who
frequently appeared together in his cartoons going back to 1963.
http://www.bethel.edu/~socsco/MediaLaw/MillerPixar2F06.html
The Starmaker
2008-07-01 20:35:26 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 08:05:21 -0700 (PDT), Primordial Ooze
Post by Rich Billionaire
What you guys don't understand is that taking inspiration from others
and building on top of what they created while adding your own ideas
is an essential part of the creative process. And there is nothing
wrong with it! It's wrong to think that every creative product must be
100% original. Many artists try to make something 100% original and
they end up creating some bizarre, ridiculous crap. You HAVE to learn
from others if you want to be great and to make worthwhile creations.
Copying is the best way to learn. The great master painters of the
past learned by copying the paintings of other masters and went on to
make great new art of their own. But when the modern artists came
along, they decided not to copy anyone and to try to do everything
100% different and original. They ended up making utter crap as a
result.
youre right but the design of wall-e is just too similar to short
circuit. He could have easily made a couple of adjustments to it, why
make it so close?
The reason why it has to be made close is because in order to
for it to work, the idea must be stolen.

Any changes to a stolen idea removes the magic from it.

For example, you take a "hanger", a clothes wire hanger,
and you bend it here and you bend it there, and you twist it
here and you twist it there, after a while you won't be able to hang
any clothes with it. You want to steal the design of a hanger you
gotta keep the shape otherwise, it doesn't work.

Hollywood makes a lot of re-makes because they are just
cashing in on an idea that has worked *before*.

It just takes "too much" artistic creativity to make an adjustment
to someone else's idea. Hollywood does not have that original artistic
creativity. So they just steal it. Wall-e is just a theft of "Short
Circuit" Johnny-5 robot character. Who knows where the story idea was
stolen from? Maybe that too will turn up when someone sees the movie
and realizes that the story idea he submitted is right up there on the
screen.

The Starmaker

I reunited my hanger!
The Starmaker
2008-07-01 21:54:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 08:05:21 -0700 (PDT), Primordial Ooze
Post by Rich Billionaire
What you guys don't understand is that taking inspiration from others
and building on top of what they created while adding your own ideas
is an essential part of the creative process. And there is nothing
wrong with it! It's wrong to think that every creative product must be
100% original. Many artists try to make something 100% original and
they end up creating some bizarre, ridiculous crap. You HAVE to learn
from others if you want to be great and to make worthwhile creations.
Copying is the best way to learn. The great master painters of the
past learned by copying the paintings of other masters and went on to
make great new art of their own. But when the modern artists came
along, they decided not to copy anyone and to try to do everything
100% different and original. They ended up making utter crap as a
result.
youre right but the design of wall-e is just too similar to short
circuit. He could have easily made a couple of adjustments to it, why
make it so close?
The reason why it has to be made close is because in order to
for it to work, the idea must be stolen.
Any changes to a stolen idea removes the magic from it.
For example, you take a "hanger", a clothes wire hanger,
and you bend it here and you bend it there, and you twist it
here and you twist it there, after a while you won't be able to hang
any clothes with it. You want to steal the design of a hanger you
gotta keep the shape otherwise, it doesn't work.
Hollywood makes a lot of re-makes because they are just
cashing in on an idea that has worked *before*.
It just takes "too much" artistic creativity to make an adjustment
to someone else's idea. Hollywood does not have that original artistic
creativity. So they just steal it. Wall-e is just a theft of "Short
Circuit" Johnny-5 robot character. Who knows where the story idea was
stolen from? Maybe that too will turn up when someone sees the movie
and realizes that the story idea he submitted is right up there on the
screen.
The Starmaker
I reunited my hanger!
I runied my hanger.
The Starmaker
2008-06-30 01:04:27 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:53:10 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:10:31 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head.
So where you come from they're deranged thugs are they?
I don't know. Probably some might be. What difference does it make?
They are, ...efficient.
You people get upset if somebody goes into your home and steals your
TV set. You probably want to kill him too! But a guy like "Andrew
Stanton", steals millions from you and you let him go. That's
deranged.
And it's not like it's the first time he stole intellectual property.
He's done it before...
Isn't that called "grand theft" or grand larceny?
I know you people just look the other way...
This "Andrew Stanton" guy is also they guy who made the movie "Finding
Nemo".

Stole it!
Loading Image...

Not only did he steal the drawing of it, but the story too!

Loading Image...


Stole it, okay. Don't be afraid to say it in his face. You see him,
tell him, "You stole it, didn't you?" and then see the smirk in his
face.

The Starmaker

STOLE IT. DON'T BE AFRAID TO CALL IT WHAT IT IS.

It's called stealing. It's theft. In Hollywood they call them Gonifs.
Warchild
2008-06-30 04:11:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:53:10 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:10:31 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head.
So where you come from they're deranged thugs are they?
I don't know. Probably some might be. What difference does it make?
They are, ...efficient.
You people get upset if somebody goes into your home and steals your
TV set. You probably want to kill him too! But a guy like "Andrew
Stanton", steals millions from you and you let him go. That's
deranged.
And it's not like it's the first time he stole intellectual property.
He's done it before...
Isn't that called "grand theft" or grand larceny?
I know you people just look the other way...
This "Andrew Stanton" guy is also they guy who made the movie "Finding
Nemo".
Stole it!
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/pierrot-the-clown-fish.jpg
Not only did he steal the drawing of it, but the story too!
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/finding-nemo-cover.jpg
Stole it, okay. Don't be afraid to say it in his face. You see him,
tell him, "You stole it, didn't you?" and then see the smirk in his
face.
The Starmaker
STOLE IT. DON'T BE AFRAID TO CALL IT WHAT IT IS.
It's called stealing. It's theft. In Hollywood they call them Gonifs.
Why would you pick such a wretched fucking example? It was proven in
court that the french clown fish claim was fraudulent.

Hey, I admit the similarities between Johnny 5 and Wall-E. But similar
is not identical.
The Starmaker
2008-06-30 04:52:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Warchild
Post by The Starmaker
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:53:10 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:10:31 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head.
So where you come from they're deranged thugs are they?
I don't know. Probably some might be. What difference does it make?
They are, ...efficient.
You people get upset if somebody goes into your home and steals your
TV set. You probably want to kill him too! But a guy like "Andrew
Stanton", steals millions from you and you let him go. That's
deranged.
And it's not like it's the first time he stole intellectual property.
He's done it before...
Isn't that called "grand theft" or grand larceny?
I know you people just look the other way...
This "Andrew Stanton" guy is also they guy who made the movie "Finding
Nemo".
Stole it!
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/pierrot-the-clown-fish.jpg
Not only did he steal the drawing of it, but the story too!
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/finding-nemo-cover.jpg
Stole it, okay. Don't be afraid to say it in his face. You see him,
tell him, "You stole it, didn't you?" and then see the smirk in his
face.
The Starmaker
STOLE IT. DON'T BE AFRAID TO CALL IT WHAT IT IS.
It's called stealing. It's theft. In Hollywood they call them Gonifs.
Why would you pick such a wretched fucking example?
It is not an example.
Post by Warchild
It was proven in
court that the french clown fish claim was fraudulent.
I'm not interested in court decisions.
Post by Warchild
Hey, I admit the similarities between Johnny 5 and Wall-E. But similar
is not identical.
"Similarities", another word for theft.

-----------------You be the judge-------------------------------

Author claims ‘Finding Nemo’ plagiarism
Striking similarity between the two fish stories

By Shiraz Sidhva
Hollywood Reporter
updated 12:21 p.m. ET, Tues., Dec. 30, 2003

PARIS - A French children’s author has sued Walt Disney Pictures and
Pixar Animation Studios, claiming the cartoon fish they catapulted to
fame in the worldwide blockbuster “Finding Nemo” was plagiarized from
his 1995 creation Pierrot Le Poisson Clown.

Pascal Kamina, a copyrights lawyer representing the author, Franck Le
Calvez, confirmed in a telephone interview Monday that the case --
claiming damages for breach of copyright and trademark and demanding
that they withdraw “Nemo” books and merchandise from French shops --
will come up for hearing in a French court Feb. 17.

Le Calvez, a 33-year-old aquarium buff, said in an interview Monday
that he registered Pierrot as a trademark with France’s industrial
protection and copyrights body in 1995. An aspiring filmmaker, Le
Calvez said he then did the rounds of French production companies and
animation studios, hoping they would fall for the lovable tropical
fish with white stripes and large orange bulging eyes. But he was
turned down, and the little fish languished in a folder until 2000,
when Le Calvez decided to make Pierrot the hero of an illustrated
children’s book.

Registering the screenplay with the French Society of Authors in June
2002, Le Calvez paid nearly $71,000 to publish 2,000 copies of the
book in November 2002. Illustrated by Robin Delpuech and Thierry
Jagodzinski, “Pierrot Le Poisson Clown” was published by France’s
Editions Flaven Scene, and the entire print run was sold in a month.

Agreeing that the uncanny resemblance between Pierrot and Nemo could
be coincidental (clown fish, Amphiprion ocellaris, do look alike in
nature), Le Calvez said he realized something was fishy only after
French bookstore chain FNAC removed copies of his book from their
shelves, claiming that it was too similar to Disney’s version.

“What’s really upsetting is that quite a few bookstores won’t sell my
book because they think that I have plagiarized ‘Nemo,”’ the author
said in an interview Monday. “The two fish look very similar, but it
doesn’t end there.”

Like Nemo, Pierrot lives in a pink sea anemone and starts life
half-orphaned because one parent was swallowed up by Liona, the
scorpion fish. “The beginning of the story is the same, even if the
scenarios then become different,” Le Calvez said.

----------------


Can you imagine Andrew Stanton when he hears that the book stores
think the French guy stole the idea from him! He must be laughing his
ass off!!
David Johnston
2008-06-30 03:07:57 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:53:10 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:10:31 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head.
So where you come from they're deranged thugs are they?
I don't know. Probably some might be. What difference does it make?
They are, ...efficient.
At quelling the production of new entertainment? By the way, where is
this fictional land?
The Starmaker
2008-06-30 05:16:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 12:53:10 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:10:31 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head.
So where you come from they're deranged thugs are they?
I don't know. Probably some might be. What difference does it make?
They are, ...efficient.
At quelling the production of new entertainment?
At quelling anything...
Post by The Starmaker
By the way, where is
this fictional land?
New York.
Seventh Avenue
The Garment Industry.
David Johnston
2008-06-30 06:36:57 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:16:12 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
By the way, where is
this fictional land?
New York.
Seventh Avenue
The Garment Industry.
Oh bullshit. The garment industry routinely imitates each other.
The Starmaker
2008-06-30 16:29:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:16:12 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
By the way, where is
this fictional land?
New York.
Seventh Avenue
The Garment Industry.
Oh bullshit. The garment industry routinely imitates each other.
"imitates"? What is it with you people having trouble saying the word
"steal"? Oh, I get it now...Jews don't steal. They just imitate,
inspired by, derivative, based on, similar, resembles, borrow, loosely
inspired by, adapted from, Inspired (either wholly or in part)" ,
everybody else (goy's) steals.

Besides, Mr. David Johnson the Deceiver, you changed the context of
your question: You asked me:


"At quelling the production of new entertainment? By the way, where
is this fictional land?"


"Quelling" means silencing.

and I answered:

New York.
Seventh Avenue
The Garment Industry.

Meaning, that in the garment industry, Jewish people in the garment
industry were silenced by shooting them.

You know what you are David Johnson, you are the worse piece of
garbage.

Quelling certainty doesn't mean imitate. You're garbage. Stay away
from my thread! You smell like garbage.


The Starmaker
David Johnston
2008-06-30 16:39:55 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:29:14 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:16:12 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
By the way, where is
this fictional land?
New York.
Seventh Avenue
The Garment Industry.
Oh bullshit. The garment industry routinely imitates each other.
"imitates"? What is it with you people having trouble saying the word
"steal"? Oh, I get it now...Jews don't steal. They just imitate,
inspired by, derivative, based on, similar, resembles, borrow, loosely
inspired by, adapted from, Inspired (either wholly or in part)" ,
everybody else (goy's) steals.
Besides, Mr. David Johnson the Deceiver, you changed the context of
"At quelling the production of new entertainment? By the way, where
is this fictional land?"
"Quelling" means silencing.
No, it doesn't. It means "suppressing", you moron.
Post by The Starmaker
New York.
Seventh Avenue
The Garment Industry.
Meaning, that in the garment industry, Jewish people in the garment
industry were silenced by shooting them.
Oh, so there are no Jews in the garment industry?
The Starmaker
2008-06-30 17:38:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:29:14 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:16:12 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
By the way, where is
this fictional land?
New York.
Seventh Avenue
The Garment Industry.
Oh bullshit. The garment industry routinely imitates each other.
"imitates"? What is it with you people having trouble saying the word
"steal"? Oh, I get it now...Jews don't steal. They just imitate,
inspired by, derivative, based on, similar, resembles, borrow, loosely
inspired by, adapted from, Inspired (either wholly or in part)" ,
everybody else (goy's) steals.
Besides, Mr. David Johnson the Deceiver, you changed the context of
"At quelling the production of new entertainment? By the way, where
is this fictional land?"
"Quelling" means silencing.
No, it doesn't. It means "suppressing", you moron.
Definitions of QUELLING on the Web:

"induced silencing" "stifling" You know what "stifle" means, don't
you?

Specifically used to describe transgene-induced silencing in
Neurospora crassa.
npg.nature.com/nrg/journal/v3/n2/glossary/nrg730_glossary.html

pacifying or suppressing
quizlet.com/print/237752/

suppression: forceful prevention; putting down by power or authority;
"the suppression of heresy"; "the quelling of the rebellion";"the
stifling of all dissent"

wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

suppression, crushing, quelling, stifling (forceful prevention;
putting down by power or authority) in otherwords, a bullet through
the head. Sorry Davy, gangsters call it silencing someone when they
put down by power.
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
New York.
Seventh Avenue
The Garment Industry.
Meaning, that in the garment industry, Jewish people in the garment
industry were silenced by shooting them.
Oh, so there are no Jews in the garment industry?
I didn't say they shot everybody! Is something *wrong* with you David?
David Johnston
2008-07-01 01:34:33 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:38:15 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
New York.
Seventh Avenue
The Garment Industry.
Meaning, that in the garment industry, Jewish people in the garment
industry were silenced by shooting them.
Oh, so there are no Jews in the garment industry?
I didn't say they shot everybody! Is something *wrong* with you David?
Yup. I'm talking to someone who won't give a straight answer, who
will for example, pretend that the place he comes from where Jews are
"silenced" for some inexplicable reason is a different place from the
place he comes from where people who imitate the words of others are
beaten and murdered.

Oh, and the reason why I don't use the word "steal" for "imitate" is
because I'm careful about what words mean. I've never had much use
for rhetorical exaggeration.
FDR
2008-07-01 15:38:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:38:15 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
New York.
Seventh Avenue
The Garment Industry.
Meaning, that in the garment industry, Jewish people in the garment
industry were silenced by shooting them.
Oh, so there are no Jews in the garment industry?
I didn't say they shot everybody! Is something *wrong* with you David?
Yup. I'm talking to someone who won't give a straight answer, who
will for example, pretend that the place he comes from where Jews are
"silenced" for some inexplicable reason is a different place from the
place he comes from where people who imitate the words of others are
beaten and murdered.
Oh, and the reason why I don't use the word "steal" for "imitate" is
because I'm careful about what words mean. I've never had much use
for rhetorical exaggeration.
Actually, for all we know the Pixar people asked for and received
permission to use #5 as a design for WALL-e. Until I hear otherwise
from the #5 creators, I will assume that they are ok with thins as is.
Seems like only Star is upset about this.
The Starmaker
2008-07-01 23:42:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by FDR
Post by David Johnston
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:38:15 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
New York.
Seventh Avenue
The Garment Industry.
Meaning, that in the garment industry, Jewish people in the garment
industry were silenced by shooting them.
Oh, so there are no Jews in the garment industry?
I didn't say they shot everybody! Is something *wrong* with you David?
Yup. I'm talking to someone who won't give a straight answer, who
will for example, pretend that the place he comes from where Jews are
"silenced" for some inexplicable reason is a different place from the
place he comes from where people who imitate the words of others are
beaten and murdered.
Oh, and the reason why I don't use the word "steal" for "imitate" is
because I'm careful about what words mean. I've never had much use
for rhetorical exaggeration.
Actually, for all we know the Pixar people asked for and received
permission to use #5 as a design for WALL-e. Until I hear otherwise
from the #5 creators, I will assume that they are ok with thins as is.
Seems like only Star is upset about this.
I'm not upset...

Would you be in the market for a bridge in Brooklyn?
~consul
2008-07-21 17:05:29 UTC
Permalink
and thus The Starmaker inscribed ...
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Oh bullshit. The garment industry routinely imitates each other.
"imitates"? What is it with you people having trouble saying the word
"steal"? Oh, I get it now...Jews don't steal. They just imitate,
inspired by, derivative, based on, similar, resembles, borrow, loosely
inspired by, adapted from, Inspired (either wholly or in part)" ,
everybody else (goy's) steals.
Besides, Mr. David Johnson the Deceiver, you changed the context of
Wow, that segued against jews pretty easily there didn't it.
--
"... respect, all good works are not done by only good folk. For here, at the end of all things, we shall do what needs to be done."
--till next time, consul -x- <<poetry.dolphins-cove.com>>
Bill Steele
2008-06-30 00:02:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
Since the plots of the movies are totally unrelated, I assume you are
basing this on the physical resemblance of the robots. Have you
looked at the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunhity? A much more likely
source. And the design is a logical one even starting from scratch.
The Starmaker
2008-06-30 00:48:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Steele
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
Since the plots of the movies are totally unrelated, I assume you are
basing this on the physical resemblance of the robots. Have you
looked at the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunhity? A much more likely
source. And the design is a logical one even starting from scratch.
I don't mind people standing up for thieves, but this is ridiculous.

They both have the same head, neck, robotic claws, square trunk and
rolling blade legs
Loading Image...

http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg

http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg


What do you think the creator of "Short Circuit" thinks?
clouddreamer
2008-06-30 00:58:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Bill Steele
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
Since the plots of the movies are totally unrelated, I assume you are
basing this on the physical resemblance of the robots. Have you
looked at the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunhity? A much more likely
source. And the design is a logical one even starting from scratch.
I don't mind people standing up for thieves, but this is ridiculous.
They both have the same head, neck, robotic claws, square trunk and
rolling blade legs
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08-2.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
What do you think the creator of "Short Circuit" thinks?
Nothing. He knows that he doesn't have the right to claim complete
ownership of any future movie/tv robot that has similar head, neck,
robotic claws, square trunk and rolling blade legs.

If one were to subscribe to your point of view then no spaceship could
ever have a round saucer and two nacelles.....no space fighter could
have X-wings...no character could be allowed to fly....no show could
ever have a similar plot line like time travel or alien invasion.

Foolishness.

The only way Short Circuit would have a case is if they replicated the
robot IDENTICALLY.

..
--
We must change the way we live,
or the climate will do it for us.


www.ipcc.ch/
clouddreamer
2008-07-01 00:32:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by clouddreamer
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Bill Steele
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
Since the plots of the movies are totally unrelated, I assume you are
basing this on the physical resemblance of the robots. Have you
looked at the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunhity? A much more likely
source. And the design is a logical one even starting from scratch.
I don't mind people standing up for thieves, but this is ridiculous.
They both have the same head, neck, robotic claws, square trunk and
rolling blade legs
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08-2.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
What do you think the creator of "Short Circuit" thinks?
Nothing. He knows that he doesn't have the right to claim complete
ownership of any future movie/tv robot that has similar head, neck,
robotic claws, square trunk and rolling blade legs.
If one were to subscribe to your point of view then no spaceship could
ever have a round saucer and two nacelles.....no space fighter could
have X-wings...no character could be allowed to fly....no show could
ever have a similar plot line like time travel or alien invasion.
Foolishness.
The only way Short Circuit would have a case is if they replicated the
robot IDENTICALLY.
..
<crickets>

..
--
We must change the way we live,
or the climate will do it for us.


www.ipcc.ch/
Invid Fan
2008-06-30 03:06:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
I don't mind people standing up for thieves, but this is ridiculous.
They both have the same head, neck, robotic claws, square trunk and
rolling blade legs
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08-2.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
What do you think the creator of "Short Circuit" thinks?
A quick google search shows that Johnny-5 was designed by Syd Mead and
Eric Allard. Find a contact address and ask them. My guess is either
they're outraged, pleased, or friends of someone at Pixar.
--
Chris Mack *quote under construction*
'Invid Fan'
David Johnston
2008-06-30 05:23:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Invid Fan
Post by The Starmaker
I don't mind people standing up for thieves, but this is ridiculous.
They both have the same head, neck, robotic claws, square trunk and
rolling blade legs
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08-2.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
What do you think the creator of "Short Circuit" thinks?
A quick google search shows that Johnny-5 was designed by Syd Mead and
Eric Allard. Find a contact address and ask them. My guess is either
they're outraged, pleased, or friends of someone at Pixar.
Of course actually Johnny-5's torso is cylindrical, not square and his
arms and hands have no resemblance to Wall-E's. Wall-E's are these
mittenlike things that retract into his torso.
jayembee
2008-06-30 19:17:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Invid Fan
Post by The Starmaker
What do you think the creator of "Short Circuit" thinks?
A quick google search shows that Johnny-5 was designed by Syd
Mead and Eric Allard. Find a contact address and ask them. My
guess is either they're outraged, pleased, or friends of someone
at Pixar.
All this reminds me of the lawsuit that 20th Century-Fox instigated
against Universal claiming that Muffit the Daggett in BSG was a
rip-off of R2D2. Presumably, the basis for the claim was that
a cute "awwww...."-inducing robot was intellectual property that
could be stolen.

And then Universal countersued, claiming that R2D2 was a ripoff
of the Drones from SILENT RUNNING.

Props to Universal for pointing out the absurdity of the situation.

-- jayembee
Steven L.
2008-06-30 03:59:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Bill Steele
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
Since the plots of the movies are totally unrelated, I assume you are
basing this on the physical resemblance of the robots. Have you
looked at the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunhity? A much more likely
source. And the design is a logical one even starting from scratch.
I don't mind people standing up for thieves, but this is ridiculous.
They both have the same head, neck, robotic claws, square trunk and
rolling blade legs
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08-2.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
What do you think the creator of "Short Circuit" thinks?
I dunno. Did the producers of every science-fiction movie featuring a
flying saucer have to pay royalties to Kenneth Arnold? (Kenneth Arnold
is credited with the very first postwar real-life saucer sighting in 1947.)

Did Emmerich's "Independence Day" have to pay royalties to the estates
of H.G. Wells and George Pal?

There are zillions of movies that are derivative. But to be considered
plagiarism, they have to lift not just a part of the premise but actual
plot points, dialogue, etc.--but without being a satire or a parody in
which the intent is ridicule.

In this case, any robot designed for off-road utility work in the
outdoors is likely to have caterpillar treads for movement, and
binocular TV cameras mounted on top. That patently obvious design
decision can't be credited to any one human being.
--
Steven L.
Email: ***@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
The Starmaker
2008-06-30 05:08:15 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:59:59 -0400, "Steven L."
Post by Steven L.
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Bill Steele
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
Since the plots of the movies are totally unrelated, I assume you are
basing this on the physical resemblance of the robots. Have you
looked at the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunhity? A much more likely
source. And the design is a logical one even starting from scratch.
I don't mind people standing up for thieves, but this is ridiculous.
They both have the same head, neck, robotic claws, square trunk and
rolling blade legs
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08-2.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
What do you think the creator of "Short Circuit" thinks?
I dunno. Did the producers of every science-fiction movie featuring a
flying saucer have to pay royalties to Kenneth Arnold? (Kenneth Arnold
is credited with the very first postwar real-life saucer sighting in 1947.)
Did Emmerich's "Independence Day" have to pay royalties to the estates
of H.G. Wells and George Pal?
There are zillions of movies that are derivative. But to be considered
plagiarism, they have to lift not just a part of the premise but actual
plot points, dialogue, etc.--but without being a satire or a parody in
which the intent is ridicule.
In this case, any robot designed for off-road utility work in the
outdoors is likely to have caterpillar treads for movement, and
binocular TV cameras mounted on top. That patently obvious design
decision can't be credited to any one human being.
"derivative"? You guys have all kinds of words for "theft".

I guess the only people who care are the ones who do the stealing, and
the ones who had it stolen from them.
remysun
2008-06-30 04:15:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
They both have the same head, neck, robotic claws, square trunk and
rolling blade
Wall-E looks like a robot E.T.
Skipper
2008-06-30 02:58:11 UTC
Permalink
In article
Post by Bill Steele
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
Since the plots of the movies are totally unrelated, I assume you are
basing this on the physical resemblance of the robots. Have you
looked at the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunhity? A much more likely
source. And the design is a logical one even starting from scratch.
Starmaker is a jackass desperate for attention who makes outrageous
statements just to get noticed.

Which is why the damned thing was cross-posted to 8 groups, 5 of them
having nothing to do with movies.

His name should be Shitmaker.
The Starmaker
2008-06-30 19:10:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Skipper
In article
Post by Bill Steele
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
Since the plots of the movies are totally unrelated, I assume you are
basing this on the physical resemblance of the robots. Have you
looked at the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunhity? A much more likely
source. And the design is a logical one even starting from scratch.
Starmaker is a jackass desperate for attention who makes outrageous
statements just to get noticed.
Which is why the damned thing was cross-posted to 8 groups, 5 of them
having nothing to do with movies.
His name should be Shitmaker.
I'm posting to the entertainment industry, television, movies, actors,
writers, ....it's not my fault you have tunnel vision. You're narrow
minded, ...and you think small.

And what are you doing writing scripts, shouldn't you be stealing like
everyone else in the industry? Don't you want to be part of the boys
club? Hang out with the other thieves? You better start gettin used to
eating lox and bagels if you want to succeed in show business.

Go ahead, put mayonnaise on your pastrami sandwich and see how far you
get.


The Starmaker
FDR
2008-06-30 23:21:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Skipper
In article
Post by Bill Steele
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
Since the plots of the movies are totally unrelated, I assume you are
basing this on the physical resemblance of the robots. Have you
looked at the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunhity? A much more likely
source. And the design is a logical one even starting from scratch.
Starmaker is a jackass desperate for attention who makes outrageous
statements just to get noticed.
Which is why the damned thing was cross-posted to 8 groups, 5 of them
having nothing to do with movies.
His name should be Shitmaker.
I'm posting to the entertainment industry, television, movies, actors,
writers, ....it's not my fault you have tunnel vision. You're narrow
minded, ...and you think small.
And what are you doing writing scripts, shouldn't you be stealing like
everyone else in the industry? Don't you want to be part of the boys
club? Hang out with the other thieves? You better start gettin used to
eating lox and bagels if you want to succeed in show business.
Go ahead, put mayonnaise on your pastrami sandwich and see how far you
get.
The Starmaker
Ahh so this is just about some jewish hatred thing. Thanks for
clarifying Star.
The Starmaker
2008-07-01 00:08:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by FDR
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Skipper
In article
Post by Bill Steele
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
Since the plots of the movies are totally unrelated, I assume you are
basing this on the physical resemblance of the robots. Have you
looked at the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunhity? A much more likely
source. And the design is a logical one even starting from scratch.
Starmaker is a jackass desperate for attention who makes outrageous
statements just to get noticed.
Which is why the damned thing was cross-posted to 8 groups, 5 of them
having nothing to do with movies.
His name should be Shitmaker.
I'm posting to the entertainment industry, television, movies, actors,
writers, ....it's not my fault you have tunnel vision. You're narrow
minded, ...and you think small.
And what are you doing writing scripts, shouldn't you be stealing like
everyone else in the industry? Don't you want to be part of the boys
club? Hang out with the other thieves? You better start gettin used to
eating lox and bagels if you want to succeed in show business.
Go ahead, put mayonnaise on your pastrami sandwich and see how far you
get.
The Starmaker
Ahh so this is just about some jewish hatred thing. Thanks for
clarifying Star.
Sorry, I didn't mean to ignite your anit-Semitic impulses. You need to
try and contain yourself, FDR. Stop projecting, you're not fooling
anyone.

The Starmaker
grotto_man
2008-07-09 09:35:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Steele
Since the plots of the movies are totally unrelated, I assume you are
basing this on the physical resemblance of the robots. Have you
looked at the Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunhity? A much more likely
source. And the design is a logical one even starting from scratch.
"Starmaker" is an obsessive antisemitic troll kook who infests the
gossip and entertainment industry newsgroups. Trying to engage him in
rational debate is pointless and the attention only encourages him.
Jax
2008-06-30 23:48:55 UTC
Permalink
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpghttp://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
The Starmaker
2008-07-01 00:23:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jax
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpghttp://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".

Are you going to tell the "judge",

"You didn't watch the movie, did you, your honor?"

He probably throw you in jail for contempt in court!

What is funny about you guys is the "Andrew Stanton" is the only one
who would agree with me that he stole it.

The Starmaker
Warchild
2008-07-01 03:56:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpghttp://www.judici
aryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
Are you going to tell the "judge",
"You didn't watch the movie, did you, your honor?"
He probably throw you in jail for contempt in court!
What is funny about you guys is the "Andrew Stanton" is the only one
who would agree with me that he stole it.
The Starmaker
Here is a rhetorical question:

"Are you an idiot?"
The Starmaker
2008-07-01 19:10:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Warchild
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpghttp://www.judici
aryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
Are you going to tell the "judge",
"You didn't watch the movie, did you, your honor?"
He probably throw you in jail for contempt in court!
What is funny about you guys is the "Andrew Stanton" is the only one
who would agree with me that he stole it.
The Starmaker
"Are you an idiot?"
Does it matter?
Auntie Lib
2008-07-01 06:15:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
I'm guessing the answer is "No, I didn't see the movie and I really
have no fucking idea what I'm talking about." Just how stupid ARE
you, Starman? No, Wall-e doesn't talk, except to say his name and
"Eva" and Number Five was a non-stop chatterbox with an actor doing
his voiceover.

Now what, exactly, was it you were saying was "stolen" from "Short
Circuit"? Be specific, please. (And, no, the fact that both movies
featured a robot doesn't count.)

elizabeth
Captain Infinity
2008-07-01 09:49:44 UTC
Permalink
Once Upon A Time,
Post by Auntie Lib
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
I'm guessing the answer is "No, I didn't see the movie and I really
have no fucking idea what I'm talking about." Just how stupid ARE
you, Starman? No, Wall-e doesn't talk, except to say his name and
"Eva" and Number Five was a non-stop chatterbox with an actor doing
his voiceover.
Now what, exactly, was it you were saying was "stolen" from "Short
Circuit"? Be specific, please. (And, no, the fact that both movies
featured a robot doesn't count.)
I think he's talking about the fact that they look almost exactly alike.
Plus, of course, that scene in Wall-e where Ally Sheedy climbs aboard
Wall-e and they dance around in circles, that was HOT!


**
Captain Infinity
tomcervo
2008-07-01 13:36:49 UTC
Permalink
I think Mel Brooks has more of a case:
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/29/firm_gets_big_cut_of_campaign_donations/?page=1
The Starmaker
2008-07-01 19:20:45 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:15:02 -0700 (PDT), Auntie Lib
Post by Auntie Lib
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
I'm guessing the answer is "No, I didn't see the movie and I really
have no fucking idea what I'm talking about." Just how stupid ARE
you, Starman? No, Wall-e doesn't talk, except to say his name and
"Eva" and Number Five was a non-stop chatterbox with an actor doing
his voiceover.
Now what, exactly, was it you were saying was "stolen" from "Short
Circuit"? Be specific, please. (And, no, the fact that both movies
featured a robot doesn't count.)
elizabeth
Can you not tell that they both look-alike?
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08-2.jpg


A one year old can see the stolen resemblance!
Disneygeek
2008-07-02 14:47:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:15:02 -0700 (PDT), Auntie Lib
Post by Auntie Lib
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
I'm guessing the answer is "No, I didn't see the movie and I really
have no fucking idea what I'm talking about."  Just how stupid ARE
you, Starman?  No, Wall-e doesn't talk, except to say his name and
"Eva" and Number Five was a non-stop chatterbox with an actor doing
his voiceover.
Now what, exactly, was it you were saying was "stolen" from "Short
Circuit"?  Be specific, please.  (And, no, the fact that both movies
featured a robot doesn't count.)
elizabeth
Can you not tell that they both look-alike?Loading Image...
A one year old can see the stolen resemblance!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
But it's not significant. Both robots were designed for a rugged
environment and so both were designed around similar themes. A judge
would look more at the two characters are they are portrayed in the
respective stories and laugh you out of court!
The Starmaker
2008-07-02 16:44:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:15:02 -0700 (PDT), Auntie Lib
Post by Auntie Lib
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
I'm guessing the answer is "No, I didn't see the movie and I really
have no fucking idea what I'm talking about." Just how stupid ARE
you, Starman? No, Wall-e doesn't talk, except to say his name and
"Eva" and Number Five was a non-stop chatterbox with an actor doing
his voiceover.
Now what, exactly, was it you were saying was "stolen" from "Short
Circuit"? Be specific, please. (And, no, the fact that both movies
featured a robot doesn't count.)
elizabeth
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpghttp://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpghttp://www.judi
Post by The Starmaker
A one year old can see the stolen resemblance!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
But it's not significant. Both robots were designed for a rugged
environment and so both were designed around similar themes. A judge
would look more at the two characters are they are portrayed in the
respective stories and laugh you out of court!
and you call yourself a "disneygeek". You should be ashamed of yourself!
Disneygeek
2008-07-03 03:24:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:15:02 -0700 (PDT), Auntie Lib
Post by Auntie Lib
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
I'm guessing the answer is "No, I didn't see the movie and I really
have no fucking idea what I'm talking about." Just how stupid ARE
you, Starman? No, Wall-e doesn't talk, except to say his name and
"Eva" and Number Five was a non-stop chatterbox with an actor doing
his voiceover.
Now what, exactly, was it you were saying was "stolen" from "Short
Circuit"? Be specific, please. (And, no, the fact that both movies
featured a robot doesn't count.)
elizabeth
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpghttp://www....
Post by The Starmaker
A one year old can see the stolen resemblance!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
But it's not significant. Both robots were designed for a rugged
environment and so both were designed around similar themes. A judge
would look more at the two characters are they are portrayed in the
respective stories and laugh you out of court!
and you call yourself a "disneygeek". You should be ashamed of yourself!
Not in the least bit. You should be ashamed at your nonsense kneejerk
reactions.
Disneygeek
2008-07-02 14:42:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Auntie Lib
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
I'm guessing the answer is "No, I didn't see the movie and I really
have no fucking idea what I'm talking about."  Just how stupid ARE
you, Starman?  No, Wall-e doesn't talk, except to say his name and
"Eva" and Number Five was a non-stop chatterbox with an actor doing
his voiceover.
Now what, exactly, was it you were saying was "stolen" from "Short
Circuit"?  Be specific, please.  (And, no, the fact that both movies
featured a robot doesn't count.)
elizabeth
I was going to post the differencees between Johnny 5 and Wall*E, but
you beat me to it.

His point is that the design of Wall*E is similar to the design of
Johnny 5 and THAT is enough to constitute "theft."

He's wrong. But you can't tell him that. He posted a lawsuit between a
French author and Pixar over "Finding Nemo" and when it was pointed
out to him that the lawsuit was dismissed as fraudlent, he responded;
"I don't care about court decisions."

So it doesn't matter, you can't win.
Skipper
2008-07-02 14:46:04 UTC
Permalink
In article
Post by Disneygeek
Post by Auntie Lib
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
I'm guessing the answer is "No, I didn't see the movie and I really
have no fucking idea what I'm talking about."  Just how stupid ARE
you, Starman?  No, Wall-e doesn't talk, except to say his name and
"Eva" and Number Five was a non-stop chatterbox with an actor doing
his voiceover.
Now what, exactly, was it you were saying was "stolen" from "Short
Circuit"?  Be specific, please.  (And, no, the fact that both movies
featured a robot doesn't count.)
elizabeth
I was going to post the differencees between Johnny 5 and Wall*E, but
you beat me to it.
His point is that the design of Wall*E is similar to the design of
Johnny 5 and THAT is enough to constitute "theft."
He's wrong. But you can't tell him that. He posted a lawsuit between a
French author and Pixar over "Finding Nemo" and when it was pointed
out to him that the lawsuit was dismissed as fraudlent, he responded;
"I don't care about court decisions."
So it doesn't matter, you can't win.
His real name is Shitmaker.
The Starmaker
2008-07-02 16:36:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Disneygeek
Post by Auntie Lib
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
I'm guessing the answer is "No, I didn't see the movie and I really
have no fucking idea what I'm talking about." Just how stupid ARE
you, Starman? No, Wall-e doesn't talk, except to say his name and
"Eva" and Number Five was a non-stop chatterbox with an actor doing
his voiceover.
Now what, exactly, was it you were saying was "stolen" from "Short
Circuit"? Be specific, please. (And, no, the fact that both movies
featured a robot doesn't count.)
elizabeth
I was going to post the differencees between Johnny 5 and Wall*E, but
you beat me to it.
His point is that the design of Wall*E is similar to the design of
Johnny 5 and THAT is enough to constitute "theft."
He's wrong. But you can't tell him that. He posted a lawsuit between a
French author and Pixar over "Finding Nemo" and when it was pointed
out to him that the lawsuit was dismissed as fraudlent, he responded;
"I don't care about court decisions."
So it doesn't matter, you can't win.
What is wrong with saying "I don't care about court decisions."?
OJ is free because of court decisions, and still others think he's
quilty, if not most people.
So, why should I care about court decisions? They don't represent the
truth, they represent laws.

Wall-e is a rip-off of Short Circuit. It's my opinion. I'm not trying to
win anything here.
Warchild
2008-07-02 23:30:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Disneygeek
Post by Auntie Lib
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
I'm guessing the answer is "No, I didn't see the movie and I really
have no fucking idea what I'm talking about." Just how stupid ARE
you, Starman? No, Wall-e doesn't talk, except to say his name and
"Eva" and Number Five was a non-stop chatterbox with an actor doing
his voiceover.
Now what, exactly, was it you were saying was "stolen" from "Short
Circuit"? Be specific, please. (And, no, the fact that both movies
featured a robot doesn't count.)
elizabeth
I was going to post the differencees between Johnny 5 and Wall*E, but
you beat me to it.
His point is that the design of Wall*E is similar to the design of
Johnny 5 and THAT is enough to constitute "theft."
He's wrong. But you can't tell him that. He posted a lawsuit between a
French author and Pixar over "Finding Nemo" and when it was pointed
out to him that the lawsuit was dismissed as fraudlent, he responded;
"I don't care about court decisions."
So it doesn't matter, you can't win.
What is wrong with saying "I don't care about court decisions."?
OJ is free because of court decisions, and still others think he's
quilty, if not most people.
So, why should I care about court decisions? They don't represent the
truth, they represent laws.
Wall-e is a rip-off of Short Circuit. It's my opinion. I'm not trying to
win anything here.
You stated that Stanton stole the design for Johnny 5, as if it were a
fact. Since you are incapable of making a cogent argument in favor of
your opinion, why should we care what you think?
The Starmaker
2008-07-02 23:49:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Warchild
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Disneygeek
Post by Auntie Lib
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
I'm guessing the answer is "No, I didn't see the movie and I really
have no fucking idea what I'm talking about." Just how stupid ARE
you, Starman? No, Wall-e doesn't talk, except to say his name and
"Eva" and Number Five was a non-stop chatterbox with an actor doing
his voiceover.
Now what, exactly, was it you were saying was "stolen" from "Short
Circuit"? Be specific, please. (And, no, the fact that both movies
featured a robot doesn't count.)
elizabeth
I was going to post the differencees between Johnny 5 and Wall*E, but
you beat me to it.
His point is that the design of Wall*E is similar to the design of
Johnny 5 and THAT is enough to constitute "theft."
He's wrong. But you can't tell him that. He posted a lawsuit between a
French author and Pixar over "Finding Nemo" and when it was pointed
out to him that the lawsuit was dismissed as fraudlent, he responded;
"I don't care about court decisions."
So it doesn't matter, you can't win.
What is wrong with saying "I don't care about court decisions."?
OJ is free because of court decisions, and still others think he's
quilty, if not most people.
So, why should I care about court decisions? They don't represent the
truth, they represent laws.
Wall-e is a rip-off of Short Circuit. It's my opinion. I'm not trying to
win anything here.
You stated that Stanton stole the design for Johnny 5, as if it were a
fact. Since you are incapable of making a cogent argument in favor of
your opinion, why should we care what you think?
I'm not the only one who thinks Stanton *stole* the design.
It's the ones who think the opposite that I find most interesting.
Disneygeek
2008-07-03 03:25:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Warchild
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Disneygeek
Post by Auntie Lib
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
I'm guessing the answer is "No, I didn't see the movie and I really
have no fucking idea what I'm talking about." Just how stupid ARE
you, Starman? No, Wall-e doesn't talk, except to say his name and
"Eva" and Number Five was a non-stop chatterbox with an actor doing
his voiceover.
Now what, exactly, was it you were saying was "stolen" from "Short
Circuit"? Be specific, please. (And, no, the fact that both movies
featured a robot doesn't count.)
elizabeth
I was going to post the differencees between Johnny 5 and Wall*E, but
you beat me to it.
His point is that the design of Wall*E is similar to the design of
Johnny 5 and THAT is enough to constitute "theft."
He's wrong. But you can't tell him that. He posted a lawsuit between a
French author and Pixar over "Finding Nemo" and when it was pointed
out to him that the lawsuit was dismissed as fraudlent, he responded;
"I don't care about court decisions."
So it doesn't matter, you can't win.
What is wrong with saying "I don't care about court decisions."?
OJ is free because of court decisions, and still others think he's
quilty, if not most people.
So, why should I care about court decisions? They don't represent the
truth, they represent laws.
Wall-e is a rip-off of Short Circuit. It's my opinion. I'm not trying to
win anything here.
You stated that Stanton stole the design for Johnny 5, as if it were a
fact. Since you are incapable of making a cogent argument in favor of
your opinion, why should we care what you think?
I'm not the only one who thinks Stanton *stole* the design.
It's the ones who think the opposite that I find most interesting.
Anyone here backing up Starmaker's comments? <crickets> Anyone?
<crickets> C'mon, anyone at all. <silence> Damn, even the crickets
left!
The Starmaker
2008-07-03 04:46:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Disneygeek
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Warchild
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Disneygeek
Post by Auntie Lib
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
I'm guessing the answer is "No, I didn't see the movie and I really
have no fucking idea what I'm talking about." Just how stupid ARE
you, Starman? No, Wall-e doesn't talk, except to say his name and
"Eva" and Number Five was a non-stop chatterbox with an actor doing
his voiceover.
Now what, exactly, was it you were saying was "stolen" from "Short
Circuit"? Be specific, please. (And, no, the fact that both movies
featured a robot doesn't count.)
elizabeth
I was going to post the differencees between Johnny 5 and Wall*E, but
you beat me to it.
His point is that the design of Wall*E is similar to the design of
Johnny 5 and THAT is enough to constitute "theft."
He's wrong. But you can't tell him that. He posted a lawsuit between a
French author and Pixar over "Finding Nemo" and when it was pointed
out to him that the lawsuit was dismissed as fraudlent, he responded;
"I don't care about court decisions."
So it doesn't matter, you can't win.
What is wrong with saying "I don't care about court decisions."?
OJ is free because of court decisions, and still others think he's
quilty, if not most people.
So, why should I care about court decisions? They don't represent the
truth, they represent laws.
Wall-e is a rip-off of Short Circuit. It's my opinion. I'm not trying to
win anything here.
You stated that Stanton stole the design for Johnny 5, as if it were a
fact. Since you are incapable of making a cogent argument in favor of
your opinion, why should we care what you think?
I'm not the only one who thinks Stanton *stole* the design.
It's the ones who think the opposite that I find most interesting.
Anyone here backing up Starmaker's comments? <crickets> Anyone?
<crickets> C'mon, anyone at all. <silence> Damn, even the crickets
left!
___ --.
.` '. \
,_ | |
.""""""|\'.""""""-./-;
|__.----| \ '. |0 \
__/ / / /| \ '.____|__|
`""""""""`"|`""'---'| \
.---' /_ |_
Disneygeek
2008-07-03 03:23:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Disneygeek
Post by Auntie Lib
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Jax
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
I heard that Wall-e doesn't talk in the movie. If he did talk I'm will
to bet he would sound just like the robot in "Short Circuit".
I'm guessing the answer is "No, I didn't see the movie and I really
have no fucking idea what I'm talking about." Just how stupid ARE
you, Starman? No, Wall-e doesn't talk, except to say his name and
"Eva" and Number Five was a non-stop chatterbox with an actor doing
his voiceover.
Now what, exactly, was it you were saying was "stolen" from "Short
Circuit"? Be specific, please. (And, no, the fact that both movies
featured a robot doesn't count.)
elizabeth
I was going to post the differencees between Johnny 5 and Wall*E, but
you beat me to it.
His point is that the design of Wall*E is similar to the design of
Johnny 5 and THAT is enough to constitute "theft."
He's wrong. But you can't tell him that. He posted a lawsuit between a
French author and Pixar over "Finding Nemo" and when it was pointed
out to him that the lawsuit was dismissed as fraudlent, he responded;
"I don't care about court decisions."
So it doesn't matter, you can't win.
What is wrong with saying "I don't care about court decisions."?
OJ is free because of court decisions, and still others think he's
quilty, if not most people.
So, why should I care about court decisions? They don't represent the
truth, they represent laws.
Wall-e is a rip-off of Short Circuit. It's my opinion. I'm not trying to
win anything here.
Well, you haven't seen the movie and you don't care about legal
decisions. So far, you're two for two.

Wall*E's design is similar to Johnny 5's, but it's hardly a "rip off."
It happens to be the best possible design for a multi-function robot.
The characterizations are completely different as are the story lines
in general.
FDR
2008-07-01 00:22:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jax
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpghttp://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
He was too busy reading Mein Kampf
Bongy's Babe
2008-07-01 14:42:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jax
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpghttp://www....
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
He was too busy reading Mein Kampf- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
EYE-CANDY SELLS but you better build a bomb shelter if those 2 Barack
Hussein Obama and Will Smith.
McCain needs to act like he did in when he was in his fighter pilot
plane and let the verbal bullets fly out of his mouth. We need his
patiotic support. Leadership and more verbage. Barack Hussein Obama
stammers and sputters without his teleprompter. So one to one debate
show-downs need to begin.
4 more years of GOP, y'all. bb
The Starmaker
2008-07-01 19:08:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by FDR
Post by Jax
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpghttp://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
He was too busy reading Mein Kampf
You don't get points in Heaven for saying things like that. God knows
in your heart you're a Jew hater. People like you are despicable.
Invid Fan
2008-07-02 01:51:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Post by FDR
Post by Jax
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpghttp://www.judic
iaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
...you didn't watch the movie, did you?
He was too busy reading Mein Kampf
You don't get points in Heaven for saying things like that. God knows
in your heart you're a Jew hater. People like you are despicable.
Oh, like Thor cares about Jews...
--
Chris Mack *quote under construction*
'Invid Fan'
The Starmaker
2008-07-02 03:12:51 UTC
Permalink
"You all" know the truth.
If it was the *other* way around,
"Short Circuit" would NEVER have been made or released.

The first thing the all the studios would have said is,
"It looks too much like Wall-e."



Everyone knows those rules don't apply to Hollywood gonifs...


On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:10:31 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
The Starmaker
2008-07-03 16:51:51 UTC
Permalink
Now, for my professional opinion...
consider me an expert witness.

As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...

It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.

It's *IMPOSSIBLE*
for Andrew Stanton
to design Wall-e
from memory. He had to
have had the photographs
to use as reference while
the drawing and designing
of Wall-e.

Johnny-5 is the father
of Wall-e. They both have the
same last name, "5", the fifth
letter of the alphabet is "E".

Johnny is the father and Wally is his son.

Wall-e is a baby version of Johnny-e.

I don't want to hear any more discussion about this!
The guy is a fuckin thief and he knows it!!

The Starmaker





On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:10:31 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
Warchild
2008-07-03 20:09:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Now, for my professional opinion...
consider me an expert witness.
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
It's *IMPOSSIBLE*
for Andrew Stanton
to design Wall-e
from memory. He had to
have had the photographs
to use as reference while
the drawing and designing
of Wall-e.
Johnny-5 is the father
of Wall-e. They both have the
same last name, "5", the fifth
letter of the alphabet is "E".
Johnny is the father and Wally is his son.
Wall-e is a baby version of Johnny-e.
I don't want to hear any more discussion about this!
The guy is a fuckin thief and he knows it!!
The Starmaker
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:10:31 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
Interesting, 'Starmaker' just made defamatory and actionable claims from
the safety of internet anonymity. What a brave, brave soul.

or a silly ass.

Take your pick.
The Starmaker
2008-07-03 20:28:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Warchild
Post by The Starmaker
Now, for my professional opinion...
consider me an expert witness.
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
It's *IMPOSSIBLE*
for Andrew Stanton
to design Wall-e
from memory. He had to
have had the photographs
to use as reference while
the drawing and designing
of Wall-e.
Johnny-5 is the father
of Wall-e. They both have the
same last name, "5", the fifth
letter of the alphabet is "E".
Johnny is the father and Wally is his son.
Wall-e is a baby version of Johnny-e.
I don't want to hear any more discussion about this!
The guy is a fuckin thief and he knows it!!
The Starmaker
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:10:31 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
Interesting, 'Starmaker' just made defamatory and actionable claims from
the safety of internet anonymity. What a brave, brave soul.
or a silly ass.
Take your pick.
I don't know where you get this idea that I'm anonymous.

And my ass isn't silly...
Disneygeek
2008-07-04 02:31:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Now, for my professional opinion...
consider me an expert witness.
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
It's *IMPOSSIBLE*
for Andrew Stanton
to design Wall-e
from memory. He had to
have had the photographs
to use as reference while
the drawing and designing
of Wall-e.
Johnny-5 is the father
of Wall-e. They both have the
same last name, "5", the fifth
letter of the alphabet is "E".
Johnny is the father and Wally is his son.
Wall-e is a baby version of Johnny-e.
I don't want to hear any more discussion about this!
The guy is a fuckin thief and he knows it!!
No, you strike me as the kind who doesn't want to discuss anything
with people who disagree with you.

They are two entirely different characters with a set of treads and
binocular eye/cameras in common.

The stories are entirely different and would never stand up as
copyright infringement.

What strikes me as odd with this (and the earlier "Lion King" debate
that was going on forever) is that people will grab some frankly
unimportant point and shake it to death while I've never seen anyone
discuss "Aladdin" which really had several cases of "lifting" from
another film. (I'll let you guys figure out which film. It shouldn't
be that hard.)
The Starmaker
2008-07-04 05:41:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Disneygeek
Post by The Starmaker
Now, for my professional opinion...
consider me an expert witness.
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
It's *IMPOSSIBLE*
for Andrew Stanton
to design Wall-e
from memory. He had to
have had the photographs
to use as reference while
the drawing and designing
of Wall-e.
Johnny-5 is the father
of Wall-e. They both have the
same last name, "5", the fifth
letter of the alphabet is "E".
Johnny is the father and Wally is his son.
Wall-e is a baby version of Johnny-e.
I don't want to hear any more discussion about this!
The guy is a fuckin thief and he knows it!!
No, you strike me as the kind who doesn't want to discuss anything
with people who disagree with you.
Well, who in the world wants to have a discussion with people who
disagree?
You disagree, FINE..I'm not going to discuss it with you!


There are none so blind as those, that will not see.
The Starmaker

I cannot believe for a moment you're a disneygeek. You of all people
should
know what original design is all about.
Disneygeek
2008-07-04 09:01:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Disneygeek
Post by The Starmaker
Now, for my professional opinion...
consider me an expert witness.
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
It's *IMPOSSIBLE*
for Andrew Stanton
to design Wall-e
from memory. He had to
have had the photographs
to use as reference while
the drawing and designing
of Wall-e.
Johnny-5 is the father
of Wall-e. They both have the
same last name, "5", the fifth
letter of the alphabet is "E".
Johnny is the father and Wally is his son.
Wall-e is a baby version of Johnny-e.
I don't want to hear any more discussion about this!
The guy is a fuckin thief and he knows it!!
No, you strike me as the kind who doesn't want to discuss anything
with people who disagree with you.
Well, who in the world wants to have a discussion with people who
disagree?
You disagree, FINE..I'm not going to discuss it with you!
Of course, the whole point of open frank discussion is to discuss your
points of view with people who have differeing points of view. But you
wouldn't follow that.
Post by The Starmaker
There are none so blind as those, that will not see.
The Starmaker
And you are one of the five blind men who perceived the elephant as a
snake.
Post by The Starmaker
I cannot believe for a moment you're a disneygeek. You of all people
should
know what original design is all about.
Now this really makes no sense. I can't be a "disneygeek" because I
won't take your side trashing Disney over what is, at best, a minor
design point?
The Starmaker
2008-07-04 20:24:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Disneygeek
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Disneygeek
Post by The Starmaker
Now, for my professional opinion...
consider me an expert witness.
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
It's *IMPOSSIBLE*
for Andrew Stanton
to design Wall-e
from memory. He had to
have had the photographs
to use as reference while
the drawing and designing
of Wall-e.
Johnny-5 is the father
of Wall-e. They both have the
same last name, "5", the fifth
letter of the alphabet is "E".
Johnny is the father and Wally is his son.
Wall-e is a baby version of Johnny-e.
I don't want to hear any more discussion about this!
The guy is a fuckin thief and he knows it!!
No, you strike me as the kind who doesn't want to discuss anything
with people who disagree with you.
Well, who in the world wants to have a discussion with people who
disagree?
You disagree, FINE..I'm not going to discuss it with you!
Of course, the whole point of open frank discussion is to discuss your
points of view with people who have differeing points of view. But you
wouldn't follow that.
You don't seem to understand...he has been found guilty of theft by my
court of law.
The penalty is death. Case closed.
Post by Disneygeek
Post by The Starmaker
There are none so blind as those, that will not see.
The Starmaker
And you are one of the five blind men who perceived the elephant as a
snake.
Andrew Stanton *is* a snake.
Post by Disneygeek
Post by The Starmaker
I cannot believe for a moment you're a disneygeek. You of all people
should
know what original design is all about.
Now this really makes no sense. I can't be a "disneygeek" because I
won't take your side trashing Disney over what is, at best, a minor
design point?
"A minor design point"? Now you're being dishonest...
The Starmaker
2008-07-05 23:12:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Disneygeek
Post by The Starmaker
Post by Disneygeek
Post by The Starmaker
Now, for my professional opinion...
consider me an expert witness.
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
It's *IMPOSSIBLE*
for Andrew Stanton
to design Wall-e
from memory. He had to
have had the photographs
to use as reference while
the drawing and designing
of Wall-e.
Johnny-5 is the father
of Wall-e. They both have the
same last name, "5", the fifth
letter of the alphabet is "E".
Johnny is the father and Wally is his son.
Wall-e is a baby version of Johnny-e.
I don't want to hear any more discussion about this!
The guy is a fuckin thief and he knows it!!
No, you strike me as the kind who doesn't want to discuss anything
with people who disagree with you.
Well, who in the world wants to have a discussion with people who
disagree?
You disagree, FINE..I'm not going to discuss it with you!
Of course, the whole point of open frank discussion is to discuss your
points of view with people who have differeing points of view. But you
wouldn't follow that.
I'm not here to have "frank discussions". I'm here to inform, educate,
announce, broadcast...
otherwise why would I post to a million newsgroups at once?

If I felt I wanted to have a discussion, I would post to only one
newsgroup at a time.
Post by Disneygeek
Post by The Starmaker
There are none so blind as those, that will not see.
The Starmaker
And you are one of the five blind men who perceived the elephant as a
snake.
Post by The Starmaker
I cannot believe for a moment you're a disneygeek. You of all people
should
know what original design is all about.
Now this really makes no sense. I can't be a "disneygeek" because I
won't take your side trashing Disney over what is, at best, a minor
design point?
I don't want you to take my side...
Gumby
2008-07-05 15:47:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Now, for my professional opinion...
consider me an expert witness.
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
It's *IMPOSSIBLE*
for Andrew Stanton
to design Wall-e
from memory. He had to
have had the photographs
to use as reference while
the drawing and designing
of Wall-e.
Johnny-5 is the father
of Wall-e. They both have the
same last name, "5", the fifth
letter of the alphabet is "E".
Johnny is the father and Wally is his son.
Wall-e is a baby version of Johnny-e.
I don't want to hear any more discussion about this!
The guy is a fuckin thief and he knows it!!
The Starmaker
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:10:31 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
If he was actually a thief, you would never be able to make those
comparisons - he'd have been much more subtle. This was a HOMAGE.
Gumby
2008-07-05 15:51:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Now, for my professional opinion...
consider me an expert witness.
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
It's *IMPOSSIBLE*
for Andrew Stanton
to design Wall-e
from memory. He had to
have had the photographs
to use as reference while
the drawing and designing
of Wall-e.
Johnny-5 is the father
of Wall-e. They both have the
same last name, "5", the fifth
letter of the alphabet is "E".
Johnny is the father and Wally is his son.
Wall-e is a baby version of Johnny-e.
I don't want to hear any more discussion about this!
The guy is a fuckin thief and he knows it!!
The Starmaker
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:10:31 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpg
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
There are also references to Star Wars, E.T., Star Trek, Apple
computers, Wall-Mart, etc. Alluding to pop culture is not theft.
Halmyre
2008-07-21 12:33:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Now, for my professional opinion...
consider me an expert witness.
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
It's *IMPOSSIBLE*
for Andrew Stanton
to design Wall-e
from memory. He had to
have had the photographs
to use as reference while
the drawing and designing
of Wall-e.
Johnny-5 is the father
of Wall-e. They both have the
same last name, "5", the fifth
letter of the alphabet is "E".
Johnny is the father and Wally is his son.
Wall-e is a baby version of Johnny-e.
I don't want to hear any more discussion about this!
The guy is a fuckin thief and he knows it!!
The Starmaker
Will you seek professional help, for crissakes!
--
Halmyre

That's you that is.
David Johnston
2008-07-21 15:17:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
The Starmaker
2008-07-21 16:27:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,

"It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot."

Here is further proof of his thievery....

Compare the Wall-e poster art with
the "Short Circuit" poster.

Loading Image...

Loading Image...

You don't have to be a professional artist, or a rocket scientist to
see he even ripped off the "poster design". The difference is day and
night. Both robots (I don't know why I have to explain this, you can
see for yourself) on a hill, both robots.. looking up to the sky.

The Starmaker
The Starmaker
2008-07-21 18:32:35 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot."
Here is further proof of his thievery....
Compare the Wall-e poster art with
the "Short Circuit" poster.
http://www.filmsy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/short_circuit.jpg
http://rayng86.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/wall-e-poster-2.jpg
You don't have to be a professional artist, or a rocket scientist to
see he even ripped off the "poster design". The difference is day and
night. Both robots (I don't know why I have to explain this, you can
see for yourself) on a hill, both robots.. looking up to the sky.
The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
poster design of Wall-e
without the aid of
the actual poster
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 poster artwork in his presence.

Loading Image...
http://www.filmsy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/short_circuit.jpg
Loading Image...

http://rayng86.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/wall-e-poster-2.jpg


In Hollywood, it's called "standard business practices".
Another word for "THEFT".

Somebody call 911 and arrest these people. Forget about calling the
police (pigs), just put a bullet through their heads.

I want to wake up in the morning
I want to see bullet ridden bodies
of studio executives
on the streets of El Lay.

Do I make myself clear?

The Starmaker
David Johnston
2008-07-21 20:26:02 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
The Starmaker
2008-07-21 21:25:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical", therefore you're lying.
The Starmaker
2008-07-21 21:42:04 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:25:49 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical", therefore you're lying.
If you're interested in the legal terminology David for *theft* in
Hollywood it's called, "substantially similar".

So if you want to use "legal mumbo jumbo" "ambulance chaser talk"
"judge Judy talk" "lawyer talk", then...

these two images
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg

are "substantially similar" to each other and constitutes *theft*.

And in my book the penalty is, death.

Case closed.


The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot."
Here is further proof of his thievery....
Compare the Wall-e poster art with
the "Short Circuit" poster.
http://www.filmsy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/short_circuit.jpg
http://rayng86.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/wall-e-poster-2.jpg
You don't have to be a professional artist, or a rocket scientist to
see he even ripped off the "poster design". The difference is day and
night. Both robots (I don't know why I have to explain this, you can
see for yourself) on a hill, both robots.. looking up to the sky.
The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
poster design of Wall-e
without the aid of
the actual poster
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 poster artwork in his presence.
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
http://www.filmsy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/short_circuit.jpg
http://iconicionic.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/jashortcircuit.jpg
http://rayng86.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/wall-e-poster-2.jpg
In Hollywood, it's called "standard business practices".
Another word for "THEFT".
Somebody call 911 and arrest these people. Forget about calling the
police (pigs), just put a bullet through their heads.
I want to wake up in the morning
I want to see bullet ridden bodies
of studio executives
on the streets of El Lay.
Do I make myself clear?
The Starmaker
David Johnston
2008-07-21 23:41:31 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:25:49 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical",
Post by The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
is a statement that only makes sense if the two robots are identical.
They aren't, so you're lying.
The Starmaker
2008-07-22 01:41:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:25:49 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical",
Post by The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
is a statement that only makes sense if the two robots are identical.
They aren't, so you're lying.
I see, you need English lessons. The operative word is "aid".

I wrote in that statement "without the aid of". Meaning,

"aid" a resource, "visual aids" "help"...Andrew Stanton wanted to
commit theft, but he needed help, assistance, visual aids, resources,
he needed pictures of "Short Circuit" robot to help him with the
design of Wall-e. It was Impossible for Andrew Stranton to design
Wall-e without the aid of the robot design of "Short Circuit".

Artist all over the world use model and photos to aid them in creating
a drawing. But to "substantially" use some one else's design where the
similarity is substantial, and put your name on it is called THEFT.

The Starmaker


But I'm sure Andrew Stanton doesn't mind being a thief, he's
surrounded by thieves! How long will it take for someone to say "Short
Circuit" is a rip-off of Wall-e?
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical", therefore you're lying.
If you're interested in the legal terminology David for *theft* in
Hollywood it's called, "substantially similar".

So if you want to use "legal mumbo jumbo" "ambulance chaser talk"
"judge Judy talk" "lawyer talk", then...

these two images
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg

are "substantially similar" to each other and constitutes *theft*.

And in my book the penalty is, death.

Case closed.


The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot."
Here is further proof of his thievery....
Compare the Wall-e poster art with
the "Short Circuit" poster.
http://www.filmsy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/short_circuit.jpg
http://rayng86.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/wall-e-poster-2.jpg
You don't have to be a professional artist, or a rocket scientist to
see he even ripped off the "poster design". The difference is day and
night. Both robots (I don't know why I have to explain this, you can
see for yourself) on a hill, both robots.. looking up to the sky.
The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
poster design of Wall-e
without the aid of
the actual poster
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 poster artwork in his presence.
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
http://www.filmsy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/short_circuit.jpg
http://iconicionic.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/jashortcircuit.jpg
http://rayng86.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/wall-e-poster-2.jpg
In Hollywood, it's called "standard business practices".
Another word for "THEFT".
Somebody call 911 and arrest these people. Forget about calling the
police (pigs), just put a bullet through their heads.
I want to wake up in the morning
I want to see bullet ridden bodies
of studio executives
on the streets of El Lay.
Do I make myself clear?
The Starmaker
David Johnston
2008-07-22 04:55:20 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:41:20 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:25:49 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical",
Post by The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
is a statement that only makes sense if the two robots are identical.
They aren't, so you're lying.
I see, you need English lessons. The operative word is "aid".
I wrote in that statement "without the aid of". Meaning,
"aid" a resource, "visual aids" "help"...Andrew Stanton wanted to
commit theft, but he needed help, assistance, visual aids, resources,
he needed pictures of "Short Circuit" robot to help him with th
Yeah. Still a lie.
The Starmaker
2008-07-22 17:01:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:41:20 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:25:49 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical",
Post by The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
is a statement that only makes sense if the two robots are identical.
They aren't, so you're lying.
I see, you need English lessons. The operative word is "aid".
I wrote in that statement "without the aid of". Meaning,
"aid" a resource, "visual aids" "help"...Andrew Stanton wanted to
commit theft, but he needed help, assistance, visual aids, resources,
he needed pictures of "Short Circuit" robot to help him with th
Yeah. Still a lie.
Well, any clear minded individual (you are the exception)
even a child..
can look at these two images
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg

and see a "substantially similarity" which in the eyes of the law
constitutes theft. That is a true statement.


Now, I'm more concerned for the creators of "Short Circuit". What are
they doing to protect their "intellectual property" from *blatant*
theft?

Blatant: Without any attempt at concealment; completely obvious;
"blatant disregard of the law";

The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:25:49 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical",
Post by The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
is a statement that only makes sense if the two robots are identical.
They aren't, so you're lying.
I see, you need English lessons. The operative word is "aid".
I wrote in that statement "without the aid of". Meaning,
"aid" a resource, "visual aids" "help"...Andrew Stanton wanted to
commit theft, but he needed help, assistance, visual aids, resources,
he needed pictures of "Short Circuit" robot to help him with the
design of Wall-e. It was Impossible for Andrew Stranton to design
Wall-e without the aid of the robot design of "Short Circuit".
Artist all over the world use model and photos to aid them in creating
a drawing. But to "substantially" use some one else's design where the
similarity is substantial, and put your name on it is called THEFT.
The Starmaker
But I'm sure Andrew Stanton doesn't mind being a thief, he's
surrounded by thieves! How long will it take for someone to say "Short
Circuit" is a rip-off of Wall-e?
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical", therefore you're lying.
If you're interested in the legal terminology David for *theft* in
Hollywood it's called, "substantially similar".
So if you want to use "legal mumbo jumbo" "ambulance chaser talk"
"judge Judy talk" "lawyer talk", then...
these two images
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
are "substantially similar" to each other and constitutes *theft*.
And in my book the penalty is, death.
Case closed.
The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot."
Here is further proof of his thievery....
Compare the Wall-e poster art with
the "Short Circuit" poster.
http://www.filmsy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/short_circuit.jpg
http://rayng86.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/wall-e-poster-2.jpg
You don't have to be a professional artist, or a rocket scientist to
see he even ripped off the "poster design". The difference is day and
night. Both robots (I don't know why I have to explain this, you can
see for yourself) on a hill, both robots.. looking up to the sky.
The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
poster design of Wall-e
without the aid of
the actual poster
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 poster artwork in his presence.
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
http://www.filmsy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/short_circuit.jpg
http://iconicionic.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/jashortcircuit.jpg
http://rayng86.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/wall-e-poster-2.jpg
In Hollywood, it's called "standard business practices".
Another word for "THEFT".
Somebody call 911 and arrest these people. Forget about calling the
police (pigs), just put a bullet through their heads.
I want to wake up in the morning
I want to see bullet ridden bodies
of studio executives
on the streets of El Lay.
Do I make myself clear?
The Starmaker
David Johnston
2008-07-22 18:23:52 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:01:06 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:41:20 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:25:49 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical",
Post by The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
is a statement that only makes sense if the two robots are identical.
They aren't, so you're lying.
I see, you need English lessons. The operative word is "aid".
I wrote in that statement "without the aid of". Meaning,
"aid" a resource, "visual aids" "help"...Andrew Stanton wanted to
commit theft, but he needed help, assistance, visual aids, resources,
he needed pictures of "Short Circuit" robot to help him with th
Yeah. Still a lie.
Well, any clear minded individual (you are the exception)
even a child..
can look at these two images
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Wall-E's body is square. Johnny 5's body is a cylinder. You are full
of crap.
The Starmaker
2008-07-22 19:36:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:01:06 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:41:20 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:25:49 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical",
Post by The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
is a statement that only makes sense if the two robots are identical.
They aren't, so you're lying.
I see, you need English lessons. The operative word is "aid".
I wrote in that statement "without the aid of". Meaning,
"aid" a resource, "visual aids" "help"...Andrew Stanton wanted to
commit theft, but he needed help, assistance, visual aids, resources,
he needed pictures of "Short Circuit" robot to help him with th
Yeah. Still a lie.
Well, any clear minded individual (you are the exception)
even a child..
can look at these two images
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Wall-E's body is square. Johnny 5's body is a cylinder. You are full
of crap.
Wall-E's body is square because it's a child version of the "Short
Circuit" adult robot.

When you draw a child, you draw a square.

Wall-e is a "child version" of "Short Circuit".

So when you create a child version, you shorten the body...

The drawing on the left (of an adult) looks like short circuit body
and on the right is the child's body....
Loading Image...

This is how you draw a child's body,
Loading Image...

Here are more examples of children drawings...
Loading Image...


This is an adult...
Loading Image...


So of course it's square, it's a child version of "Short Circuit".
It's also outright theft of the "Short Circuit" robot, plus he stole
the design of the poster!
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg


Andrew Stranton is a thief.



The Starmaker





------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:41:20 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:25:49 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical",
Post by The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
is a statement that only makes sense if the two robots are identical.
They aren't, so you're lying.
I see, you need English lessons. The operative word is "aid".
I wrote in that statement "without the aid of". Meaning,
"aid" a resource, "visual aids" "help"...Andrew Stanton wanted to
commit theft, but he needed help, assistance, visual aids, resources,
he needed pictures of "Short Circuit" robot to help him with th
Yeah. Still a lie.
Well, any clear minded individual (you are the exception)
even a child..
can look at these two images
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
and see a "substantially similarity" which in the eyes of the law
constitutes theft. That is a true statement.
Now, I'm more concerned for the creators of "Short Circuit". What are
they doing to protect their "intellectual property" from *blatant*
theft?
Blatant: Without any attempt at concealment; completely obvious;
"blatant disregard of the law";
The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:25:49 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical",
Post by The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
is a statement that only makes sense if the two robots are identical.
They aren't, so you're lying.
I see, you need English lessons. The operative word is "aid".
I wrote in that statement "without the aid of". Meaning,
"aid" a resource, "visual aids" "help"...Andrew Stanton wanted to
commit theft, but he needed help, assistance, visual aids, resources,
he needed pictures of "Short Circuit" robot to help him with the
design of Wall-e. It was Impossible for Andrew Stranton to design
Wall-e without the aid of the robot design of "Short Circuit".
Artist all over the world use model and photos to aid them in creating
a drawing. But to "substantially" use some one else's design where the
similarity is substantial, and put your name on it is called THEFT.
The Starmaker
But I'm sure Andrew Stanton doesn't mind being a thief, he's
surrounded by thieves! How long will it take for someone to say "Short
Circuit" is a rip-off of Wall-e?
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical", therefore you're lying.
If you're interested in the legal terminology David for *theft* in
Hollywood it's called, "substantially similar".
So if you want to use "legal mumbo jumbo" "ambulance chaser talk"
"judge Judy talk" "lawyer talk", then...
these two images
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
are "substantially similar" to each other and constitutes *theft*.
And in my book the penalty is, death.
Case closed.
The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot."
Here is further proof of his thievery....
Compare the Wall-e poster art with
the "Short Circuit" poster.
http://www.filmsy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/short_circuit.jpg
http://rayng86.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/wall-e-poster-2.jpg
You don't have to be a professional artist, or a rocket scientist to
see he even ripped off the "poster design". The difference is day and
night. Both robots (I don't know why I have to explain this, you can
see for yourself) on a hill, both robots.. looking up to the sky.
The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
poster design of Wall-e
without the aid of
the actual poster
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 poster artwork in his presence.
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
http://www.filmsy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/short_circuit.jpg
http://iconicionic.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/jashortcircuit.jpg
http://rayng86.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/wall-e-poster-2.jpg
In Hollywood, it's called "standard business practices".
Another word for "THEFT".
Somebody call 911 and arrest these people. Forget about calling the
police (pigs), just put a bullet through their heads.
I want to wake up in the morning
I want to see bullet ridden bodies
of studio executives
on the streets of El Lay.
Do I make myself clear?
The Starmaker
David Johnston
2008-07-22 21:17:02 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:36:29 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
I wrote in that statement "without the aid of". Meaning,
"aid" a resource, "visual aids" "help"...Andrew Stanton wanted to
commit theft, but he needed help, assistance, visual aids, resources,
he needed pictures of "Short Circuit" robot to help him with th
Yeah. Still a lie.
Well, any clear minded individual (you are the exception)
even a child..
can look at these two images
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Wall-E's body is square. Johnny 5's body is a cylinder. You are full
of crap.
Wall-E's body is square because it's a child version of the "Short
Circuit" adult robot.
When you draw a child, you draw a square.
No I don't. I draw a shorter version of an adult. Unless the kid is
really fat.
Post by The Starmaker
Wall-e is a "child version" of "Short Circuit".
So why would he need visual aids to create a robot that doesn't
particularly look like Johnny Five?
The Starmaker
2008-07-22 23:45:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:36:29 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
I wrote in that statement "without the aid of". Meaning,
"aid" a resource, "visual aids" "help"...Andrew Stanton wanted to
commit theft, but he needed help, assistance, visual aids, resources,
he needed pictures of "Short Circuit" robot to help him with th
Yeah. Still a lie.
Well, any clear minded individual (you are the exception)
even a child..
can look at these two images
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Wall-E's body is square. Johnny 5's body is a cylinder. You are full
of crap.
Wall-E's body is square because it's a child version of the "Short
Circuit" adult robot.
When you draw a child, you draw a square.
No I don't. I draw a shorter version of an adult. Unless the kid is
really fat.
Post by The Starmaker
Wall-e is a "child version" of "Short Circuit".
So why would he need visual aids to create a robot that doesn't
particularly look like Johnny Five?
He needed visual aids to create a robot that looked "similar" to
Johnny Five, but he end up creating a robot that is "substantially
similar" to Johnny Five that the overall effect resulted in theft. He
got greedy. He said to himself, "Fuck it, let them sue me! If they try
to sue me they will never work in this town again!!"


Entertainment Attorneys advises their stealing clients that if they
are going to steal intellectual property, don't look at it. Because
the thieves have a tendency to steal everything they can, to a point
it looks "substantially similar".

The Starmaker

David, do the artwork of these two posters look similar to you?
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
David Johnston
2008-07-23 05:53:04 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:45:50 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
Wall-e is a "child version" of "Short Circuit".
So why would he need visual aids to create a robot that doesn't
particularly look like Johnny Five?
He needed visual aids to create a robot that looked "similar" to
Johnny Five,
No he didn't.
The Starmaker
2008-07-23 17:24:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:45:50 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
Wall-e is a "child version" of "Short Circuit".
So why would he need visual aids to create a robot that doesn't
particularly look like Johnny Five?
He needed visual aids to create a robot that looked "similar" to
Johnny Five,
No he didn't.
he did 2.
The Starmaker
2008-07-23 18:31:43 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:45:50 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
David, do the artwork of these two posters look similar to you?
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Hey David, you forgot to answer the question....

Do the artwork of these two posters look similar to you?
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg


It's okay to say they don't. Everyone is expecting *that* answer from
you!

Even God wants to know what you're going to say!!


Jesus Christ is probably cracking up right now.

The Devil is saying, "Oh, he belongs to me!"
David Johnston
2008-07-23 18:52:20 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:31:43 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:45:50 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
David, do the artwork of these two posters look similar to you?
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Hey David, you forgot to answer the question....
Do the artwork of these two posters look similar to you?
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Sure they look similar. So what?
The Starmaker
2008-07-23 19:25:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:31:43 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:45:50 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
David, do the artwork of these two posters look similar to you?
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Hey David, you forgot to answer the question....
Do the artwork of these two posters look similar to you?
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Sure they look similar. So what?
Do you think it's just a coincidence that they look similar? I mean, seems
intentional but really is just an accident??
David Johnston
2008-07-23 19:51:59 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:25:04 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:31:43 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:45:50 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
David, do the artwork of these two posters look similar to you?
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Hey David, you forgot to answer the question....
Do the artwork of these two posters look similar to you?
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Sure they look similar. So what?
Do you think it's just a coincidence that they look similar?
No, I think you are lying when you claimed that the only way to create
Wall-E was with intensive study from every angle of Johnny 5. Try to
pay attention.
The Starmaker
2008-07-23 20:30:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Johnston
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:25:04 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:31:43 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:45:50 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
David, do the artwork of these two posters look similar to you?
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Hey David, you forgot to answer the question....
Do the artwork of these two posters look similar to you?
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Sure they look similar. So what?
Do you think it's just a coincidence that they look similar?
No, I think you are lying when you claimed that the only way to create
Wall-E was with intensive study from every angle of Johnny 5. Try to
pay attention.
Well he certainty couldn't accomplish from memory if he only saw the
movie once. And everyone in the media claims it is a rip-off. And the
poster looks too similar, which means he had to have the poster also
of Short Circuit in front of him in the making of the Wall-e poster.

The hardest thing for an artist to do is to draw from *memory*.

When Leonardo Da Vinci painted the Mona Lisa he told her "Will you
keep still bitch?" "And knock off that silly smile on you face!!!"
"Don't move otherwise I'll forget."

If you want to test an artist ability, the hardest test you can give
him is to ask him to draw something from memory.

The Starmaker
David Johnston
2008-07-23 21:14:23 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:30:58 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:25:04 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:31:43 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:45:50 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
David, do the artwork of these two posters look similar to you?
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Hey David, you forgot to answer the question....
Do the artwork of these two posters look similar to you?
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Sure they look similar. So what?
Do you think it's just a coincidence that they look similar?
No, I think you are lying when you claimed that the only way to create
Wall-E was with intensive study from every angle of Johnny 5. Try to
pay attention.
Well he certainty couldn't accomplish from memory if he only saw the
movie once. And everyone in the media claims it is a rip-off. And the
poster looks too similar, which means he had to have the poster also
of Short Circuit in front of him in the making of the Wall-e poster.
The hardest thing for an artist to do is to draw from *memory*.
You mean if an artist drew from memory he might include changes like a
square boxy torso instead of a long cyndrical torso, eyes that are
larger, arms that retract into the body instead of just folding back,
exposed wheels on the triangular treads instead of having it covered
with a triangle of metal, mitten-like hands instead of fingers and
instead of a poster of a robot on a hill facing outward toward the
audience as lightning flares around it, , they might have a robot in
profile looking pensively up at the stars? They might produce that
kind of discrepancy?
The Starmaker
2008-07-23 18:15:38 UTC
Permalink
For *others* (that means excluding David Johnson), here is what the
media is currently saying :

http://news.google.com/news?tab=wn&ned=us&q=wall-e++%22short+circuit%22&ie=UTF-8

National Post, Canada
Johnny 5 -- The creators of Wall-E definitely had to have the star of
Short Circuit and Short Circuit 2 in mind when they were coming up
with Wall-E's ...

Hmm all my kids think Wall-E is a animated version of the "Short
Circuit" ...

Scotsman, United Kingdom
The character design may owe a substantial debt to Short Circuit –
however much Pixar denies it –


Newsday, NY
Wall-E does bear more than a passing resemblance to No. 5, the
military-built robot on the run in "Short Circuit.”


RedOrbit, TX - Jul 19, 2008
The eponymous hero, clearly modelled on Johnny 5 from '80s hit Short
Circuit,


Shiny Shiny, UK - Jul 8, 2008
Am I the only one who thinks WALL-E looks like an updated, animated
version of Jonny 5 from Short Circuit?

The Earth's sole inhabitant is a robot named Wall-E, a machine which
bears more than a passing resemblance to Number Five from the Short
Circuit movies

sure what to expect from “Wall-E.” Like most of you, all I saw when I
was looking at photos of the titular robot was Number Five from “Short
Circuit. ...

Many have commented that WALL-E is physically similar to Johnny 5 -
the robot from the 1986 film Short Circuit - although Stanton denies
this as an influence, adding: 'If I was influenced by anything it was
by R2D2.

(What a fuckin liar that Stanton is. A liar and a thief, worse kind of
human being on the planet. )


WALL·E himself looks a lot like robot Number 5 from Short Circuit

If you can get past the fact the cute little robot is almost an exact
replica of Jonny 5 from 1986’s “Short Circuit,” then the movie might
seem original.


This would be where I’d normally make a Johnny 5/Short Circuit joke,
but since I’m afraid of Disney’s lawyers, I think I’ll refrain. ...


Also opening at the Village 8 is Short Circuit 6. Oh wait, that’s just
what it looks like. Actually the film is called Wall-E,



The Starmaker








On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:36:29 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:01:06 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:41:20 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:25:49 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical",
Post by The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
is a statement that only makes sense if the two robots are identical.
They aren't, so you're lying.
I see, you need English lessons. The operative word is "aid".
I wrote in that statement "without the aid of". Meaning,
"aid" a resource, "visual aids" "help"...Andrew Stanton wanted to
commit theft, but he needed help, assistance, visual aids, resources,
he needed pictures of "Short Circuit" robot to help him with th
Yeah. Still a lie.
Well, any clear minded individual (you are the exception)
even a child..
can look at these two images
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Wall-E's body is square. Johnny 5's body is a cylinder. You are full
of crap.
Wall-E's body is square because it's a child version of the "Short
Circuit" adult robot.
When you draw a child, you draw a square.
Wall-e is a "child version" of "Short Circuit".
So when you create a child version, you shorten the body...
The drawing on the left (of an adult) looks like short circuit body
and on the right is the child's body....
http://danidraws.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/kids02.jpg
This is how you draw a child's body,
http://dclips.fundraw.com/zobo500dir/professordenis_Kids_Sticks.jpg
Here are more examples of children drawings...
http://www.bdainternationalconference.org/2001/presentations/images/zafiropoulou_1_05%20.gif
This is an adult...
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v171/supafly345/posts/StickMonster.gif
So of course it's square, it's a child version of "Short Circuit".
It's also outright theft of the "Short Circuit" robot, plus he stole
the design of the poster!
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
Andrew Stranton is a thief.
The Starmaker
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:41:20 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:25:49 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical",
Post by The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
is a statement that only makes sense if the two robots are identical.
They aren't, so you're lying.
I see, you need English lessons. The operative word is "aid".
I wrote in that statement "without the aid of". Meaning,
"aid" a resource, "visual aids" "help"...Andrew Stanton wanted to
commit theft, but he needed help, assistance, visual aids, resources,
he needed pictures of "Short Circuit" robot to help him with th
Yeah. Still a lie.
Well, any clear minded individual (you are the exception)
even a child..
can look at these two images
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
and see a "substantially similarity" which in the eyes of the law
constitutes theft. That is a true statement.
Now, I'm more concerned for the creators of "Short Circuit". What are
they doing to protect their "intellectual property" from *blatant*
theft?
Blatant: Without any attempt at concealment; completely obvious;
"blatant disregard of the law";
The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:25:49 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical",
Post by The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
is a statement that only makes sense if the two robots are identical.
They aren't, so you're lying.
I see, you need English lessons. The operative word is "aid".
I wrote in that statement "without the aid of". Meaning,
"aid" a resource, "visual aids" "help"...Andrew Stanton wanted to
commit theft, but he needed help, assistance, visual aids, resources,
he needed pictures of "Short Circuit" robot to help him with the
design of Wall-e. It was Impossible for Andrew Stranton to design
Wall-e without the aid of the robot design of "Short Circuit".
Artist all over the world use model and photos to aid them in creating
a drawing. But to "substantially" use some one else's design where the
similarity is substantial, and put your name on it is called THEFT.
The Starmaker
But I'm sure Andrew Stanton doesn't mind being a thief, he's
surrounded by thieves! How long will it take for someone to say "Short
Circuit" is a rip-off of Wall-e?
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
Repeating it doesn't make it not a lie. The two robots are not
identical. Therefore you're lying.
I *never* used the word "identical", therefore you're lying.
If you're interested in the legal terminology David for *theft* in
Hollywood it's called, "substantially similar".
So if you want to use "legal mumbo jumbo" "ambulance chaser talk"
"judge Judy talk" "lawyer talk", then...
these two images
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
are "substantially similar" to each other and constitutes *theft*.
And in my book the penalty is, death.
Case closed.
The Starmaker
Post by David Johnston
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:27:53 -0700, The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
Post by The Starmaker
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
I'll repeat,
"It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot."
Here is further proof of his thievery....
Compare the Wall-e poster art with
the "Short Circuit" poster.
http://www.filmsy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/short_circuit.jpg
http://rayng86.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/wall-e-poster-2.jpg
You don't have to be a professional artist, or a rocket scientist to
see he even ripped off the "poster design". The difference is day and
night. Both robots (I don't know why I have to explain this, you can
see for yourself) on a hill, both robots.. looking up to the sky.
The Starmaker
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
poster design of Wall-e
without the aid of
the actual poster
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 poster artwork in his presence.
http://dwerf.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/walle_shortcircuit.jpg
http://www.filmsy.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/short_circuit.jpg
http://iconicionic.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/jashortcircuit.jpg
http://rayng86.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/wall-e-poster-2.jpg
In Hollywood, it's called "standard business practices".
Another word for "THEFT".
Somebody call 911 and arrest these people. Forget about calling the
police (pigs), just put a bullet through their heads.
I want to wake up in the morning
I want to see bullet ridden bodies
of studio executives
on the streets of El Lay.
Do I make myself clear?
The Starmaker
The Starmaker
2008-07-23 22:12:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by The Starmaker
Do I make myself clear?
The Starmaker
You've flogged this horse until it's petrified. Do you have a dog in
this hunt? If not, quit posting about this, nobody here cares.
N.
My your own fucking business, bitch.

Captain Infinity
2008-07-22 00:26:53 UTC
Permalink
Once Upon A Time,
Post by David Johnston
Post by The Starmaker
As a professional artist
knowing about the
world of art...
It's *impossible*
for Andrew Stanton
to come up with the
design of Wall-e
without the aid of
either the actual
"Short Circuit" robot
Johnny-5 in his presence,
or having numerous photos
of "Johnny-5" at every angle including
the back of the robot.
Given that you are lying about it being impossible, can we take it
that you are lying about being a professional artist?
As a professional pharmacist, I can attest to the fact that it would be
*impossible* for Andrew Stanton to have come up with the design of EVE
without the aid of strong, mind-altering pharmaceuticals. Just *look* at
her, she's even SHAPED like a big white pill. Clearly, Stanton was under
the influence of reality-bending drugs when he developed this movie.
Wait....movie? There's nothing *moving*! It's just a long sequence of
single, immovable images flipping by one-after-the-other at a very fast
rate! The whole thing is a sham! A SHAM, I TELLS YOU!! DON'T BE FOOLED!
DON'T BELIEVE IT!! AAAAH! SOMEONE HELP GET THESE BUGS OFF OF MEEEEE!!



**
Captain Infinity
Gumby
2008-07-05 15:44:06 UTC
Permalink
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/johnny-5-4-22-08.jpghttp://www.judiciaryreport.com/images/wall-e-4-22-08.jpg
The director of "Wall-E" Andrew Stanton has ripped off "Short Circuit"
and renamed him Wall-E.
You know, ...when you hang out in Hollywood with "these people",
(and you know what I mean by "these people", these people who run
Hollywood)
when you hang out with *them*, you end up stealing like they they do!
You start thinking like they do and call it "standard business
practices". But it's just theft, stealing, ripping-off.
I'm wondering, ...what is the creator of "Short Circuit" really
feeling? What is he muttering under his breath in the dark?
Where I come from, you're suppose to take a guy like "Andrew Stanton"
and put a bullet through his head. You have to make an example to
these people. You have to send the message, the consequences of
stealing somebody elses work is death.
The Starmaker
Rip-off and homage are two very different things.
Loading...