Opinion

Twenty years later, Rachel Corrie lives

Twenty years ago, an Israeli bulldozer crushed Rachel Corrie to death as she protected a Palestinian home. She has since become a global symbol for those seeking justice. Israel may have killed Rachel, but she lives on in us.

Twenty years ago, on March 16, 2003, an Israeli military bulldozer crushed American solidarity activist Rachel Corrie to death a few kilometers away from my home in Rafah in the Gaza Strip. She was one of several International Solidarity Movement (ISM) activists trying to stop the demolition of Palestinian homes there.

Israel’s Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, had launched a campaign to destroy thousands of Palestinian homes to establish a buffer zone on the Palestinian-Egyptian border. ISM activists arrived in the area to express humanitarian solidarity with civilians facing Israel’s occupation machine. This machine was, and is, generously supported by the United States government, Rachel’s homeland.  

At that early age, I was not interested in politics, but politics isn’t a choice for Palestinians. 

House demolitions, air bombardments, and tank attacks on civilian neighborhoods were a daily occurrence. When I heard the news of Rachel’s death, my first thought was: “She is an American. Surely, she has good opportunities in her homeland. Why did she choose to risk her life and come to Palestine in solidarity with people of a different ethnicity, race, and religion?”  

Rachel was 23 when she was killed. She could have satisfied her conscience by protesting against global injustice in a demonstration in America or by calling for a boycott of the aggressors. 

But her high sense of morality was not satisfied with these symbolic gestures. Her conscience would not rest without complete involvement, without standing side-by-side with us. That’s why she came to Palestine. 

She lived in Palestinian homes threatened with demolition. She endured the same difficult days and nights to which Palestinian families were subjected and heard the same sounds of indiscriminate gunfire from Israeli tanks, yet she still risked her life so she could answer the call of her conscience.  

Rachel did not pose any danger to Israeli soldiers that conducted their daily exercise of demolishing Palestinian homes. She was an unarmed woman, wearing a bright-colored vest and shouting through a megaphone in front of the bulldozer. 

But the presence of Rachel and her colleagues posed an ethical challenge to the Israeli occupation because these solidarity activists exposed the false Israeli narrative that it was conducting security operations. The truth was that they were targeting civilian families.  

The intentional killing of Rachel Corrie was a message of intimidation to solidarity activists, telling them to stop hindering Israeli soldiers during their daily ritual of house demolition and killing civilians.

Rachel’s parents sought justice in Israeli courts for the killing of their daughter. An Israeli judge at the Haifa District Court ruled that Corrie’s death was an accident for which the state of Israel was not responsible, and the Israeli Supreme Court agreed. Her family wrote that the court decision “amounts to judicial sanction of immunity for Israeli military forces when they commit injustices and human rights violations.”

Rachel Corrie standing before an Israeli bulldozer in Rafah, Gaza. (Photo: AP)
Rachel Corrie standing before an Israeli bulldozer in Rafah, Gaza. (Photo: AP)

As I grew older, my awareness of Rachel increased. I listened to one of her clips on YouTube. She was a child talking about her dream in life:  

“I’m here for other children. I’m here because I care. I’m here because children everywhere are suffering and because 40000 people die each day from hunger. I’m here because those people are mostly children, we have got to understand that the poor are all around us, and we are ignoring them. We have got to understand that these deaths are preventable, we have got to understand that people in third world countries are us. We are them. My dream is to stop hunger by the year 2000. My dream is to give the poor a chance. My dream is to save the 40000 people who die each day. My dream can and will come true if we all look into the future and see the light that shines there.” 

I listened to the clip repeatedly. As a child, Rachel told us the exact reason that led her to Palestine — a child’s dream of a world where justice prevails, and people don’t die because of oppression.  

Rachel’s dreams have not been realized yet. Hunger in our world has not ended, and the homes she tried to preserve in Palestine are still being demolished. 

But belief in that same dream has not ebbed. Rachel’s spirit inspired many believers who see the light of the future and continue to raise their voices against injustice and oppression. 

These believers now make up the grassroots movements worldwide that are opposed to the forces of apartheid and colonialism and understand the fight for freedom and humanity as their unified global fight. 

Rachel’s name is in my heart as a symbol of moral purity. Her most important message was that her country’s political leadership does not represent American citizens, many of whom believe in freedom, justice, and dignity for all people. Although the United States is normally synonymous with its total financial and military backing of Israel’s occupation, Rachel’s example removed many of the negative connotations about the U.S. from the hearts of many Palestinians.

When I got the chance to visit the U.S. in 2019 on a speaking tour, the first thing that came to mind was wanting to meet Rachel’s family. I asked the trip coordinator from the AFSC about the possibility, and the organizers were generous enough to make it happen. I met Craig and Cindy Corrie in Georgia. We spent the day together and visited the Martin Luther King Museum.

Ahmed Abu Artema meeting Cindy and Craig Corrie during a speaking tour in the United States. (Photo: Jennifer Bing)
Ahmed Abu Artema meeting Cindy and Craig Corrie during a speaking tour in the United States. (Photo: Jennifer Bing)

I told Rachel’s parents that their daughter was generous. She came to our town in solidarity and paid with her life for the values she believed in. I told them that they were generous to me in our meeting with their true feelings of love and solidarity.

Twenty years on, Rachel’s spirit still lives among all those who believe in freedom and justice worldwide. Sadly, the entry of activists into Gaza has become more complicated, let alone almost impossible, due to the tight restrictions imposed by the Israeli occupation. Yet the spirit of solidarity with the rights of the Palestinian people can be seen everywhere.  

Rachel’s spirit was present in the protests of May 2021 that took to the streets throughout the U.S.   

These protests are a recent example that the official discrimination policies of the Israeli colonial state haven’t succeeded in killing the collective conscience of people and their belief in justice and freedom for all.  

Rachel’s case was cast aside by Israel’s colonial courts. But Rachel won. 

She became a worldwide symbol of freedom and a source of inspiration for everyone who dreams of a world of justice and peace.

Israel may have killed her, but Rachel Corrie lives on in all of us.


Ahmed Abu Artema
Born in Rafah, Gaza Strip, in 1984, Ahmed Abu Artema is a Palestinian refugee. An independent Gaza-based writer and political activist, he has written the book “Organized Chaos” and numerous articles. He is one of the original founders and organizers of the Great Return March. He is currently a member of the group Palestine Without Borders.


15 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Thank you for this beautiful piece. Yes, she does live on in all of us.

Al brave young lady who was passionate about human rights and justice. She sacrificed her own life to protect others. It is unfortunate her own country did nothing to hold those killers responsible for her murder. Israel has a history of lying when it comes to the murders of those standing up to their violence . First they deny it, then they blame the other side, or the victim, then when confronted with the facts, they cry “accident”, or admit it.

Disgraceful liars.

To the claims that Israel does not order these so called “accidents”, keep in mind Shireen Abu Akleh’s assassination was yet another zionist lie, and even after they had to admit they were the criminals, they now REFUSE to allow their brutal forces involved to be interviewed or investigated, in order to get justice for this poor lady. It is sheer arrogance, duplicity, and acting like they are above all laws, emboldened by the support the US, UK, and the EU, keeps giving them. Damn enablers every one of them.

Again, the world’s greatest democracy has shown indifference when it comes to the killing of Americans by the apartheid nation, and goes along with the lies and deceit.

I guess saying “we are concerned” is good enough.

Rachel Corrie was victim to long-standing Israeli policies. She was an American citizen.

Tom Hurndall, a British citizen, was shot in the head by Israeli forces during a march. There was a movie made about him.
The Shooting of Thomas Hurndall:

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1145529/

——
And many many others were killed at the hands of Israeli forces as they did nothing wrong.

Rachel Corrie was killed by a Caterpillar D9 bulldozer, an armored version.

In 2002, Israel invaded the Jenin Refugee Camp. For days, an Israeli Jewish bulldozer operator “worked” the camp, eventually destroying more than 300 houses. He would later brag that he made Palestinians a ‘stadium’, as a result of flattening all those houses.

Look up images of Jenin destruction in 2002. For some reason I can’t link to images on here.

https://www.hrw.org/reports/2002/israel3/israel0502-01.htm

However, particularly in the Hawashin district, the destruction extended well beyond any conceivable purpose of gaining access to fighters, and was vastly disproportionate to the military objectives pursued. The damage to Jenin camp by missile and tank fire and bulldozer destruction has shocked many observers. At least 140 buildings-most of them multi-family dwellings-were completely destroyed in the camp, and severe damage caused to more than 200 others has rendered them uninhabitable or unsafe. An estimated 4,000 people, more than a quarter of the population of the camp, were rendered homeless because of this destruction. Serious damage was also done to the water, sewage and electrical infrastructure of the camp. More than one hundred of the 140 completely destroyed buildings were in Hawashin district.

[…]

The harm from this destruction was aggravated by the inadequate warning given to civilian residents. Although warnings were issued on multiple occasions by the IDF, many civilians only learned of the risk as bulldozers began to crush their houses. Jamal Fayid, a thirty-seven-year-old paralyzed man, was killed when the IDF bulldozed his home on top of him, refusing to allow his relatives the time to remove him from the home. Sixty-five-year-old Muhammad Abu Saba`a had to plead with an IDF bulldozer operator to stop demolishing his home while his family remained inside; when he returned to his half-demolished home, he was shot dead by an Israeli soldier.

Rachel Corrie was certainly idealistic, but also reckless and it’s ridiculous to imagine that the bulldozer driver was somehow given orders to deliver a “message of intimidation”. In both the IDF investigation and the civil courts the basic issue was whether or not the driver could see her and in both cases the court believed his testimony ( backed by a lie-detector test) – that he couldn’t.
A good account can be read here:
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2003/09/death-rachel-corrie/