BEATLES: NOW AND THEN

A blogging comrade recently mentioned a Beatles podcast where the presenters led off their series with a negative review of Help! In my response, I observed that I tended not to write negative reviews, especially of beloved albums. Overnight, several things have caused me to reflect on that pronouncement. I detected the cloying scent of not only pomposity but, as John might have sneered, instant karma.

First up is the announcement of an expanded box set edition of the famous Beatles Red and Blue compilations, up from two double albums to a pair of triples*. Connected with this lavish re-issue is the revelation of a release date for “Now And Then”, a “final” Beatles single based on a John demo, new Paul bass and Ringo drums, and some George AI magic. Are you excited? Are you recalling “Free As A Bird”?  Isn’t it time to just let it be?

(See the POSTSCRIPT below for a brief reflection on ‘Now and Then’)

The other thing I recalled was the time I wrote an unvarnished review for Discrepancy Records. It was for another Beatles re-issue.

*

LET IT BE: AN EPITAPH

The story of Let It Be, the last Beatles album, is so full of acrimony and disappointment you could make a film about it. Someone has already? Twice? One miserable, one cheerful? Oh, OK. 

Maybe a book, then. 

Any book about Let It Be would be a sizeable tome where the first half simply corrected misconceptions and myths about this full-stop in the life of the world’s most famous band.

For instance, the timing of the album. The recordings that became Let It Be are commonly referred to as the ‘Get Back’ sessions and occurred after The Beatles (aka The White Album) and before sessions for Abbey Road (the last album recorded). It was Paul McCartney’s idea to return to the band’s roots, creating the simpler, more direct music of their youth. The band came on board, also agreeing to proceedings being filmed with the goal of presenting a multi-media package: album, film, live concert. In the end, the film was a portrait of disharmony, a study in disinterest, while the concert was a brief blast on top of the Apple building on a freezing January day in 1969.

After recordings finished—and despite what re-writing history might seek to portray, they were not harmonious; George stormed off on one occasion, went home, wrote ‘Wah Wah’; read the lyric— the musicians were united on one thing: they didn’t think much of the recordings. So the tapes were shelved for months while the much more satisfying Abbey Road was recorded (and released) and the no-longer-fab four went about other projects such as Ringo’s acting career and Paul’s first solo album. Regardless of the band’s disengagement, however, the film ground through post-production and was scheduled for release in May 1970. 

Eventually, someone remembered there needed to be an album to go with the film. 

The tapes were retrieved, overdubs added (contrary to the original vision of an ‘honest’ stripped back record) and a hotchpotch of old songs, new songs and snippets was readied for presentation to a world eager for more Beatles. Trouble was, it wasn’t really an album. ‘Dig It’ is fifty seconds from a twelve minute jam around John rapping. ‘Dig A Pony’: fun but very lightweight. ‘For You Blue’ is an undistinguished blues. As for ‘Maggie Mae’, it is an incomplete scrap of a bawdy song about a Liverpool prostitute, the inclusion of which (and its positioning) serves only to undermine Paul’s ‘Let It Be’. As for the other key song—’The Long And Winding Road’—its superb McCartney melody is redolent with sadness and is accompanied by a touching lyric… but the recording was a demo, with just Paul on piano and John on bass. Casually played bass. Bass with bum notes. Something would be needed to cover Lennon’s mediocre playing if the demo was to be salvaged.

In March 1970, John, impressed with Phil Spector’s work on the Plastic Ono Band album and ‘Instant Karma’ single, asked the American producer to ready the material for release, despite George Martin having already supervised mastering of the album. This, it must be stressed, was without the knowledge of Martin or the other Beatles. George Harrison was planning his debut album, Paul—having been secretly recording for months—was on the brink of releasing his, Ringo’s LP was ready to roll too. Later, Martin observed that he produced Let It Be and Phil Spector over-produced it, a barb difficult to deflect. So what did the ‘Wall of Sound’ man do? 

Spector remixed a number of tracks, extended Harrison’s ‘I Me Mine’ by simply copying across a large chunk to the end, and most contentiously, added strings and choirs to ‘Let it be’ and ‘The long and winding road’. Here lies one of the many ironies of Let It Be. Lennon facilitated Spector’s syrupy strings covering his own ordinary playing on McCartney’s memorable song. Kind of says it all, really. 

So much more could be written about Let It Be and the process that produced it. About the original dodgy lyrics to ‘Get Back’ that still seem dodgy today; about Mother Mary not referencing a religious text but a dream Paul had where his dead mum (Mary) appeared and told him to chill. About how Phil Spector did not write the orchestrations, only commissioned and conducted them. How the countless hours of film footage were eventually reduced to 80 minutes, which Paul, George and Ringo watched but which John and Yoko chose not to preview. How until the last minute, the whole thing was called ‘Get Back’. About how none of the Beatles attended either the New York or the Liverpool film premiers. How the film won an Oscar for best ‘Original song score’, the award being accepted on their behalf by Quincy Jones. How reception of Let It Be was decidedly lukewarm, with one reviewer labelling it ‘a cheapskate epitaph, a cardboard tombstone, a glorified EP.’ The general consensus was that it was uneven, under-whelming and certainly over-produced.

Yet Let It Be has retained a place as a loved Beatles album, despite it being their least interesting LP, musically speaking. Successive generations have clutched its patchy glories like a threadbare security blanket. The last Beatles album. It should have been Abbey Road, a fitting send off in every respect, but instead it is the desperately flawed Let It Be. We overlook the faults, paper over the cracks. We do not wish to see our idols tarnished. Perhaps that’s why there is a new film arising from the Twickenham Studio ashes. Maybe that’s why Giles Martin sought to refresh the sound of the album for its belated fiftieth anniversary, and did a sterling job… within the constraints of the source material. It could be there is still a real hunger to somehow raise from the dead Paul’s original get-back-to-basics idea; think about 2003’s Let It Be… Naked and now another crack at a Get Back album in the current deluxe edition. Then there is our appetite for projects shining new light through old windows; we don’t demand dazzle, just the warmth of an old lover, gently reheated. These, in combination, could explain Pitchfork’s 9.1 out of 10 rating for the 2021 deluxe re-issue.

In the end, our desire for more John, Paul, George and Ringo is a cultural echo of Beatlemania fuelled by a yearning for an expansive, more exciting time when pop music soared higher than an Apollo space rocket. Icarus forgotten, people truly believed something could go up and not come down. Today, we’ll celebrate accept any little lift we can extract from the storied, lighter-than-air past.

REFERENCES

Lewisohn, Mark (1988) The Complete Beatles Recording Sessions. Hamlyn/EMI, London, UK.

Lewisohn, Mark (1992) The Complete Beatles Chronicle. Chancellor Press, London, UK.

Macdonald, Ian (1995) Revolution In The Head. Pimlico, London, UK.

Nelson, Elizabeth (16 October 2021) The Beatles Let It Be (Super Deluxe). Accessed 28 November 2021. <https://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/the-beatles-let-it-be-super-deluxe/>

Wikipedia (29 November 2021) Let It Be (1970 film). Accessed 30 November 2021. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let_It_Be_(1970_film)#Release>

* It must be said that the inclusion of extra George Harrison songs is a worthwhile and overdue expansion.

© Bruce Jenkins.

Originally published at Discrepancy Records, December 2021

Reprinted with kind permission and a new preamble and postscript

*

POSTSCRIPT

So the so-called last Beatles single, ‘Now and Then,’ has dropped and is… OK. A pleasant late-Lennon song of yearning tinged with regret, it has had layers of production added to thicken everything on its rather thin bones. But pretending this is The Beatles is less valid than calling Ringo’s Ringo the last Beatles album because Lennon, McCartney and Harrison all appear alongside the long-suffering drummer. At least on Ringo everyone was alive and doing their thing in real time.

Ringo’s drums on ‘Now and Then’, by the way, are a modest highlight.

Alexis Petridis wrote an excellent piece in The Guardian where he muses about all the kerfuffle and wonders if it is an elderly Paul laying some ghosts. Why not? He’s earned that right and no-one is forcing us to listen.

And if nothing else, it has produced the quote of the year from Oasis’ Liam Gallagher. Here’s the context and its marvellous punchline (also from a Guardian article):

Liam Gallagher appeared to have had an early listen to ‘Now and Then’, writing on X on Thursday morning: “Absolutely incredible biblical celestial heartbreaking and heartwarming all at the same time.” When asked by a fan if he was worried he wouldn’t like the song, Gallagher replied: “The Beatles could shit in my handbag and I’d still hide my polo mints in there.”

I suppose the very least one can say is that ‘Now and Then’ is better than the previous two posthumous releases. John doesn’t sound quite so much like a ghost.

That qualified endorsement should be taken as a warning. If the ‘new’ single sells shedloads—and it obviously will—expect to see a AI assisted re-mixes of ‘Real Love’ and ‘Free As A Bird’ , perhaps in time for next Christmas.

*

16 comments

  1. Badfinger (Max) · · Reply

    I have to admit…I’m looking forward to the song. I missed the first time around and was 3 when they broke up.
    About Let It Be. I’ll never understand why they didn’t include Don’t Let Me Down…that would have improved it. I know they treated singles different but that was the B side to Get Back which was on the album. I did like I’ve Got A Feeling and I Dig A Pony because of that guitar riff.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Fair comments, all, Max. I have some time for “I’ve got a feeling” too, it being a collaboration an’ all. Also, your point about feeling a thrill of expectation, something denied you by the year of your birth, makes sense. That’s why Jurassic Park works, isn’t it? We all want to re-create extinct species in any way we can, to discover that thrill for ourselves.
      Thanks for your comments.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Badfinger (Max) · · Reply

        Yes it was… when I heard Free As A Bird I got chills…I thought…wow…this is the first time I’ve ever heard a “new” Beatles song…as sad as that is!
        I will say though…I’m not such a fan to think they did nothing wrong…they did have clinkers like every other band (Wild Honey Pie and more). This album was one of their worse…well next to Yellow Submarine.
        It was a wonderful written post.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Some wonderful writing here, Bruce: ‘projects shining new light through old windows’, ‘Icarus forgotten, people truly believed something could go up and not come down’. Despite my love for John, Paul, George and Ringo, I admit that my response to the news of a forthcoming ‘new’ song was…*meh*

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you JDB. Given I was, in a way, biting the hand that feeds me with this review, I thought it better be solid. (Grins, perhaps a little mischievously.)
      Reflecting on your and my ‘meh’, and Max (Badfinger)’s excitement, I came up with a Jurassic Park analogy. I’ll try it out and see how it flies. 🙂

      Like

  3. “Are you excited?” Yes. “Are you recalling “Free As A Bird”?” I hope. Real Love would be even better. “Isn’t it time to just let it be?” Nope. Interesting take on Let It Be, Bruce.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thank you for completing the questionnaire, Geo.R. It seems that opinions and indeed expectations cover a broad range. That is as it should be, statistically speaking.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. I was about 40 before I realised that it was actually allowed to criticise the Beatles in any way whatsoever, such was my upbringing. Luckily I see little reason to do so most of the time.

    I really do like Let It be Naked, which I am very pleased I bought on vinyl at the time incidentally.

    Free as a bird was shite and I have no doubt the other new new new one will be too, as will the next one after that.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Nice to have the naked Let It Be on the black stuff. I quite like it too. At the very least it seems more honest.

      (Joe, I wrote a bit in reply about ‘Now and Then’ and then decided to upgrade the post with a post-script, cutting and pasting from here.)

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Update: I really like Now And Then; the video made me cry and that’s even with me knowing I’m being manipulated, damnit!!

        Liked by 1 person

        1. You ol’ softy, you. Especially as you absolutely know that they spend a bomb on the vid to distract us from how vin ordinaire the music is.

          Liked by 1 person

          1. I know it, but I still sobbed when I saw George doing George things.

            Liked by 2 people

  5. I came to love the original “Let It Be”. Only years later did I learn about the Phil Spector controversy. I actually still like it. If anything, the Peter Jackson “Get Back” TV series made me gain new appreciation. That said, I also like Let It Be “Naked”.

    As for “Now and Then”, I’m mostly impressed with the incredible sound quality and how the song was put together. I think the song itself isn’t bad but certainly doesn’t compare to the music The Beatles made in the ’60s.

    At the end of the day, I’m happy they released “Now and Then”, but I can also see where people are coming from, who say that after more than 50 years that The Beatles broke up it’s time to stop releasing “new” music.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. D’you know, Christian, it’s not the post break-up aspect that troubles me, it’s the half-deceased aspect. Just let it be, I reckon.

      Having said that I get that many people, especially those too young to catch anything the first time around, are thrilled to have a faint echo of Beatle excitement.

      Liked by 1 person

Comments and responses welcome for all posts: present or past. Please join in!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.