06.06.2013 Views

HAMEED AL-TAI o/a GMB AUTO SALE SHOPPE ... - Debbie Schlussel

HAMEED AL-TAI o/a GMB AUTO SALE SHOPPE ... - Debbie Schlussel

HAMEED AL-TAI o/a GMB AUTO SALE SHOPPE ... - Debbie Schlussel

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Licence Tribunal<br />

Appeal d'appel en<br />

Tribunal matière de permis<br />

<strong>HAMEED</strong> <strong>AL</strong>-<strong>TAI</strong> o/a <strong>GMB</strong> <strong>AUTO</strong> S<strong>AL</strong>E <strong>SHOPPE</strong> and HUSSEIN DABAJA<br />

AN APPE<strong>AL</strong> FROM A PROPOS<strong>AL</strong> OF THE REGISTRAR UNDER<br />

THE MOTOR VEHICLE DE<strong>AL</strong>ERS ACT, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter<br />

M.42 AS AMENDED TO REVOKE REGISTATION<br />

TRIBUN<strong>AL</strong>: DOUGLAS R. W<strong>AL</strong>LACE, VICE-CHAIR<br />

APPEARANCES: AVIVA R. HARARI, representing the Registrar, Motor Vehicle<br />

Dealers Act<br />

DATE OF<br />

HEARING: August 15, 2006 Windsor<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

REASONS FOR DECISION AND ORDER<br />

This Hearing arises out of a Notice of Proposal issued by the Registrar on April 6, 2006<br />

seeking to revoke the registrations of the Hameed Al-Tai o/a <strong>GMB</strong> Auto Sale Shoppe as<br />

a Dealer and the individual Applicant, Hussein Dabaja as a salesperson under Section 6<br />

of the Motor Vehicle Dealers Act.<br />

The reason for the Registrar’s Proposal is that the past conduct of the Registrants is<br />

inconsistent with the intention and objective of the Act, namely that the business they<br />

are engaged in be carried on in accordance with the law and with integrity and honesty.<br />

The Proposal sets out the particulars relied on as follows:<br />

1. Hameed Al-Tai o/a <strong>GMB</strong> Auto Sale has been registered as a motor vehicle dealer<br />

since on or about August 22, 2005. The Dealer is registered on Terms and<br />

Conditions.<br />

2. Hussein Dabaja, also known as Sam, at all material times was registered as a<br />

motor vehicle salesperson to Hameed At-Tai o/a <strong>GMB</strong> Auto Sale.


3. On or about January 7, 2006, Dabaja, on behalf of the dealer purchased motor<br />

vehicles from Guelph Toyota. A cheque drawn on an account in the dealer’s name<br />

was given to Guelph Toyota as payment for the vehicles purchased, however the<br />

cheque was returned as non-negotiable.<br />

4. A replacement cheque was provided to Guelph Toyota, drawn on the dealer’s<br />

account. The second cheque was returned as non-negotiable.<br />

5. On or about January 3, 2006, Dabaja, on behalf of the dealer, purchased motor<br />

vehicles from Leslie Motors Ltd.<br />

6. Payment for the vehicles purchased by the dealer from Leslie Motors Inc. was<br />

made by cheque drawn on the dealer’s account. The cheque was returned as nonnegotiable.<br />

A replacement cheque drawn on the dealer’s account was also<br />

returned as non-negotiable.<br />

The Respondent provided Further Particulars of the reasons for his Proposal to revoke<br />

both registrations by Notice dated July 17, 2006 as follows:<br />

1. On or about May 30, 2006 the Dealer purchased a 2004 Infinity FX45 from<br />

VJLRH London Inc. The cheque issued for payment of the vehicle did not clear<br />

the bank and was returned as non-negotiable.<br />

2. On or about May 30, 2006 the Dealer purchased a 1998 BMW from Grand<br />

Touring Cars. The cheque issued for payment of the vehicle did not clear the<br />

bank and was returned as non-negotiable.<br />

3. The Dealer has breached clauses 5,6, 7 and 16 of his terms and conditions.<br />

4. Dabaja is operating as Windsor Auto Exchange without the benefit of registration.<br />

5. The Dealer has failed to respond to inquiries from the Registrar’s office.<br />

6. The Dealer purchased vehicles from Windsor Chrysler. The cheque initially<br />

issued by the Dealer for payment of the vehicles did not clear the bank and was<br />

returned as non-negotiable.<br />

7. The Dealer and Windsor Chrysler were ultimately able to resolve the issues with<br />

the intervention of the Registrar’s office.<br />

The Applicants filed a Notice of Appeal with the Tribunal on April 19, 2006 and<br />

submitted two filing fees. Counsel for the Applicant, Hameed Al-Tai, o/a <strong>GMB</strong> Auto<br />

Sale Shoppe faxed a letter to counsel for the Respondent on August 15, 2006<br />

purporting to abandon the appeal by Mr. Al-Tai. There was apparently no<br />

communication concerning this purported abandonment with the Registrar of the<br />

Tribunal. Neither Applicant appeared at the Hearing by counsel or in person.<br />

2


THE EVIDENCE<br />

No evidence was adduced by the Applicants.<br />

Counsel for the Registrar called six witnesses and tendered a Book of Documents<br />

which was filed as Exhibit 4.<br />

Mark Leslie is a registered Dealer carrying on business as Leslie Motors Ltd. He was<br />

approached in January 2006 by Hussein (Sam) Dabaja who wished to purchase two<br />

vehicles on behalf of <strong>GMB</strong> Auto Sales. Agreement was reached for the sale of the<br />

vehicles for a total price of $13,482.00. As payment Mr. Dabaja presented him with a<br />

cheque in that amount drawn on the account of <strong>GMB</strong> Auto Sale Shoppe and signed by<br />

Hameed Al-Tai. When the cheque was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds he<br />

contacted Mr. Dabaja on four occasions obtaining repeated promises of payment. No<br />

payment was ever received and the vehicles have not been recovered. .<br />

Tony Moon is a registered salesman with Guelph Toyota. He reached agreement with<br />

Sam Dabaja on January 7, 2006 for the sale of three vehicles to <strong>GMB</strong> Auto Sales for a<br />

total price of $29,440.00. In return he received a cheque dated January 11, 2006 drawn<br />

on the account of <strong>GMB</strong> Auto Sale Shoppe and signed by Hameed Al-Tai. Both this<br />

cheque and a replacement cheque in the amount of $28,355.00 were returned as nonnegotiable.<br />

Contacts between Guelph Toyota and Mr. Dabaja resulted in apologies but<br />

no payment. The vehicles have not been recovered by Guelph Toyota.<br />

Mr. Rob Weber is registered and employed with Windsor Chrysler. He testified that<br />

Windsor Chrysler sold eight vehicles to <strong>GMB</strong> Auto Sales through its General Manager,<br />

Sam Dabaja in March 2006. Windsor Chrysler received payment of $16,700 leaving a<br />

balance of approximately $72,000.00 covered by dishonoured cheques.<br />

Armand Cavacas is a registered salesperson with Volvo Jaguar Land Rover of London.<br />

He testified that Sam Dabaja, acting on behalf of <strong>GMB</strong> Auto Sales, purchased and took<br />

delivery of a 2004 Infiniti motor vehicle from VJLRH London Inc. on May 30, 2006 for<br />

the total price of $44,940.00. The purchase was paid for by a cheque in this amount<br />

drawn on the account of Windsor Auto Exchange and signed by Mr. Hameed Al-Tai.<br />

The cheque was returned as non-negotiable. Although Sam Dabaja promised to make<br />

payment, no payment was ever received.<br />

Tim Houson is a registered salesperson with Grand Touring Cars in London. Sam<br />

Dabaja purchased a BMW for <strong>GMB</strong> Auto Sales from him in May, 2006 for $13,910.00.<br />

The cheque drawn on the account of Windsor Auto Exchange and signed by Hussein<br />

Al-Tai was not honoured by his bank. Grand Touring Cars was able to recover<br />

possession of the vehicle from the auto auction before it could be resold by GBM.<br />

3


The final witness testifying on behalf of the Respondent was Yvonne Hallitt. Ms. Hallitt<br />

has been employed by the Ontario Motor Vehicle Industry Council (OMVIC) for ten<br />

years. She is currently the Administrator of the OMVIC compensation fund and Team<br />

Leader of the Complaints Department. She testified that OMVIC was created in 1997 to<br />

administer the Ontario Motor Vehicle Dealers Act with the primary purpose of protecting<br />

the public.<br />

It is her evidence that Hameed Al-Tai is currently registered as a dealer under the Motor<br />

Vehicle Dealers Act operating as <strong>GMB</strong> Auto Sale Shoppe. His registration is subject to<br />

terms and conditions entered into on August 22, 2005. In clause 31 of these terms and<br />

conditions Mr. Al-Tai acknowledges that “the Registrar may take further administrative<br />

action, including a proposal to revoke its registration, arising from any matters that have<br />

occurred or may occur related to honesty and integrity or financial position.”<br />

Ms. Hallitt spoke to both Hameed Al-Tai and Hussein Dabaja in February 2006<br />

concerning the complaints by Guelph Toyota and Leslie Motors. Mr. Al-Tai indicated he<br />

knew nothing about their complaints and that it was his usual practice to give Mr.<br />

Dabaja signed blank cheques to cover purchases. Once aware of the complaints Mr. Al-<br />

Tai failed to advise OMVIC of any steps taken to resolve them.<br />

Documents identified by Ms. Hallitt indicate that Mr. Dabaja is the sole proprietor of<br />

Windsor Auto Exchange Neither Mr. Dabaja nor Windsor Auto Exchange are registered<br />

as dealers under the Motor Vehicle Dealers Act.<br />

Based on this evidence the Tribunal finds as follows:<br />

1. Mr. Hussein (Sam) Dabaja made a practice of purchasing vehicles on behalf of<br />

<strong>GMB</strong> Auto Sale Shoppe by providing vendors with cheques which he knew or<br />

ought to have known would not be honoured.<br />

2. Mr. Hameed Al-Tai, operating as <strong>GMB</strong> Auto Sale Shoppe facilitated this practice<br />

by providing Mr. Dabaja with blank cheques and failed to take reasonable steps<br />

to stop the practice when he knew or should have known about it.<br />

3. Neither Mr. Dabaja nor Mr. Al-Tai took any steps to reimburse honest dealers for<br />

the losses they incurred as a result of relying on their good faith.<br />

4. The acts of Mr. Dabaja and Mr. Al-Tai were dishonest and showed a complete<br />

lack of integrity.<br />

5. The evidence presented on behalf of the Registrar fully supports the reasons<br />

given by the Registrar for proposing to revoke the registrations of both Hameed<br />

Al-Tai, operating as <strong>GMB</strong> Auto Sale Shoppe and Hussein Dabaja.<br />

4


THE LAW<br />

Subsection 6(2) of the Act authorizes the Registrar to revoke the registration of a dealer<br />

or salesperson for any reason that would disentitle the registrant to registration under<br />

section 5 of the Act. Paragraph (b) of subsection 5(1) of the Act allows the Registrar to<br />

refuse registration where he finds that the past conduct of an individual applicant affords<br />

reasonable grounds to believe that the applicant will not carry on the business in<br />

accordance with laws and with integrity and honesty.<br />

APPLICATION OF THE LAW TO THE FACTS<br />

The Tribunal finds that the acts of the Applicants set out above constitute reasonable<br />

grounds for the Registrar to believe that the Applicants will not carry on their business<br />

under the Act in accordance with law, and with honesty and integrity.<br />

DECISION<br />

In accordance with the authority vested in it by subsection 7(4) of the Motor Vehicle<br />

Dealers Act the Tribunal directs the Registrar to carry out his proposal of April 6, 2006<br />

to revoke the registrations of Hameed Al-Tai, operating as <strong>GMB</strong> Auto Sale Shoppe and<br />

Hussein Dabaja.<br />

Counsel for the Registrar and most of the six witnesses called to give evidence incurred<br />

significant out-of-pocket expenses in attending the Hearing from out of-town. In light of<br />

the failure of either Applicant to attend the Hearing or to send a representative when<br />

proper notice of the Hearing was given, and in the absence of any notice prior to the<br />

opening of the Hearing that the Applicants would not be attending, the Tribunal<br />

exercising its discretion under Rule 14 assesses costs in the fixed amount of $800.00<br />

against each Applicant.<br />

Released August 30, 2006<br />

LICENCE APPE<strong>AL</strong> TRIBUN<strong>AL</strong><br />

_________________________<br />

Douglas R. Wallace, Vice-Chair<br />

Filename: 3525.mvda.Hameed Al-Tai o/a <strong>GMB</strong> <strong>AUTO</strong> Sale Shoppe and Hussein Dabaja<br />

The decision will also be available on Quicklaw at a later date.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!