Materials in Tensegrity Structures

Page 1

TENSEGRITY STRUCTURES & MATERIALS

VẬT LIỆU DÂY CĂNG


Lecturer:

Đặng Ngọc Anh

Students:

Vũ Chúc Linh Nguyễn Thị Phương Thảo

Hanoi Architectural University Institute of International Training & Cooperation 19KTT2 - Vật liệu và Kiến trúc (Materials and Architecture)


table of contents HISTORY AND DEFINITION + history + definition TYPOLOGIES MATERIALS + tensile component + cover + compressive component + feelings + conveniences, obstacles and applications CASE STUDIES + 1988 seoul olympics gymnastics hall + 2009 kurilpa bridge Q&A REFERENCES


HISTORY AND DEFINITION


In the beginning of the 20th century, more specifically 1919, the artistic and architectural philosophy Constructivism flourished in the Soviet Union as a rejection of the idea of vain and autonomous art. The movement promoted art as a practice for social purposes. Constructivism had a significant impact on the 20th century modern art movements, including architecture, graphic, industrial design, and so forth.

Tensegrity ’s discovery was directly influenced by Constructivism, namely Latvian-Soviet avant-garde artist Karl Ioganson’s “self-tensile constructions” shown in The Society of Young Artist 2nd Moscow exhibit in 1921


Art student Kenneth Snelson discovered Tensegrity in 1948 and 1949 after his inspirational introduction to American architect, systems theorist, designer, inventor, and futurist Richard Buckminster Fuller at Black Mountain College near Asheville, North Carolina. Taking inspiration from Fuller’s lectures on geometric models and his own research on Russian Constructivism, Snelson started studying 3-dimensional model and creating different sculptures, including the "X-shape" (Fig 1) his first tensegrity art piece, which he showed to Fuller in 1949. In 1955, R.Buckminster Fuller coined the term “Tensegrity”, which short for “Tensional - Integrity” and is commonly used nowadays to refer to this particular system. While Snelson, who continued with his research separately from Fuller, called the structure “floating compressions”.

Note (structural) Integrity is the ability of said structure to hold together under a load including its own weight, without breaking or deforming excessively

R.B. Fuller & Kenneth Snelson

Fig 1: “X-shape” 1948 by Kenneth Snelson


At the same time, but independently, Hungarian architect and engineer David Georges Emmerich, inspired by constructivist artist Karl Ioganson's structure (Fig 2), started to study similar tensegrity systems that ranged from simple to complex (Fig 3,4) However, he would call his works "structures tendues et autotendants", which could be translated to “Tensile and self-stressing structure” in English.

Fig 2: Ioganson’s structure that can be found in the exhibit

Fig 3,4: Emmerich’s models (1958-1960)

The Society of Young Artists 2nd exhibit,1921 Moscow, Russia


All three men patented the basic system under different names. ➔ Why are these types of structural systems widely referred to as “tensegrity” systems?

➢ ➢

Arch. Richard Buckminster Fuller (1) Arch. Engr. David Georges Emmerich (2)

-

Sculptor Kenneth Duane Snelson (3)

Patent granted 1962 for “Tensile-Integrity structure” Patent granted 1964 for “Self-stressing construction” Patent granted 1965 for “Continuous tension, discontinuous compression structures”

Not only was Fuller’s “tensional integrity” the first successfully granted patent among the trio, he was an avid promoter of the concept of "tensional integrity". He provided a comprehensive definition of the term in his book Synergetics. Despite his writings being considered difficult to understand line by line, many of his concepts are applicable to real life structural systems.

(1)

(2)

Snelson & Emmerich

Tensegrit y

Fuller

(3)


Kenneth Snelson’s patent was the only one to display the structural generation of the structural system.

Comparison of the details of the three patents


DEFINITION "A tensegrity system is a system in a stable self-equilibrated state comprising a discontinuous set of compressed components inside a continuum of tensioned components."

"A tensegrity system is established when a set of discontinuous compressive components interacts with a set of continuous tensile components to define a stable volume in space".

Note ● ● ●

Self-equilibrated state is achieved with the balance between opposing component or forces in a system Compressed components don’t touch All components on the boundary should be tensioned components


"Inside" is the key word in the definition since it will allow us to separate two kinds of structural design: ➔

One which is a part of our constructive culture and based on compression as in the sustaining load effect, classified as tensegrity

One based on tension as fundamental "support". E.g spokes on bicycle wheels.

Fundamental support

R.B. Fuller wheels analysis


how loads are distributed:

d

rte ive

d

di

ve

rte

d

=> lighter load

The structure adapts a slightly different shape as the load is applied to it.


quick math ;) 3x compressed components = s (in length) 9x tensioned components = c (in length) r=s/c=1.468^8, else: collapse or impossible to build.

Components: -

-

=> equilibrated (balanced) system:

TENSION/TRACTION Compression Compressed components: compression being discontinuous and a constant value - In use atypically: Note traction: a state of tension created by pulling forces steel, bamboo, wood. Result: A SELF-STRESS SYSTEM Tensioned components: tension being continuous ● has stiffness and a constant value - In use a typically: cable steel. ● less materials & solid spaces Nodes: connection between compressed components ● unaffected by external force and tensioned components


“Structure-Sculpture” 1921 by Karl Ioganson R.Emmerich named “elementary equilibrium” and regarded as first proto-tensegrity system

“X-shape” 1949 by Kenneth Snelson R.B.Fuller regards as the first tensegrity structure

Both aren’t considered “tensegrity” by recent definitions - Ioganson’s structure is handled by means of an eighth unstressed cable, the whole being deformable, hence, doesn’t satisfy the “self-stressed” criteria. - In the case of X-shape, 2 strings are attached to the platform, rendering the tensioned components of the structure discontinuous


In 1968, Kenneth Snelson built the 26,5 meter tall “Needle Tower” with stainless steel trusses and aluminum cables, which soon became one of the most iconic examples of tensegrity. He would further work with tensegrity as an essential part of his sculptures until the end of his career

(1) Two pieces (2) Six#2 (3) Curve Throne

(4) “Needle Tower” 1968 (5) Kenneth Snelson working in his studio 1961 (6) Kenneth Snelson in front of “Soft Landing” 1982


While Snelson avoided physical and mathematical approaches of tensegrity, Fuller and Emmerich studied the different possible typologies of tensegrity, mainly spherical and one-dimensional systems: masts. They looked for possible applications of tensegrity to architecture and engineering.

Urban tensegrity 1958 / David Georges Emmerich

Three of Fuller’s basic structures (Tensegrity mast, Geodesic dome, octet truss) in Modern Museum, N.Y.

Fuller holding a 120-strut Geodesic Tensegrity Sphere


Shortly after viewing Snelson’s “X-shape” sculpture, Fuller studied several simple compositions, and produced a family of four Tensegrity masts with vertical side-faces of three, four, five and six each, respectively. He also discovered the 6-strut icosahedron (6-strut 20-face shape) Tensegrity system. ➔ The work was carried on by different people to create a hierarchy of tensegrity systems and fundamental laws of universal tensegrity structuring. 6-strut Icosahedron Tensegrity system

Tensegrity mast with 4 vertical side-faces

"Geodesic Tensegrity Dome" 1953 / R. B. Fuller

Despite having made great strides in the development of “Tensegrity”, R.B.Fuller never got to fulfill his dream of covering a whole city with a geodesic tensegrity dome. Despite his several attempts at the design, the final application of Tensegrity was not as successful as he thought it would be.


Moreover, Richard “Bucky” Fuller also believed that works of tensegrity were more natural than works of solely compression, as similar systems are found in the biomechanics of living creatures. “Nature relies on continuous tension to embrace islanded compression elements”

Continuous tension


Broadening the subject, Fuller would further philosophize that "[..] in the mechanical structuring of the universe, that compressive organisation is limited to the [..] spheres themselves, and that vaster structural integrity of the universe is maintained within the infinite limits of tensile stress principles only, which we identify as gravitational attraction.” _Designing a New Industry, 1945

Russian constructivism Movement

R.B.Fuller’s Energetic Synergetic Geometry lectures at Blackwood

“Universe tensionally coheres non-simultaneous events. Therefore, Universe is tensional integrity” _University of Michigan Mid Century Conference on Housing, 1949 Kenneth Snelson making the “X-shape”

Establishing the elementary tensegrity form “Universe is tensional integrity” _ R.B.Fuller


TYPOLOGIES


Spherical the cable set is always homeomorphic to a sphere.

Motro (2003). Tensegrity: Structural Systems for the Future


Prismatic The smallest spatial one that can be built. From the triangular we can add some twist to the nodes and cable thus creating variations.

Motro (2003). Tensegrity: Structural Systems for the Future


Rhombic "Each strut of a "rhombus system" constitutes the longest diagonal of a rhombus of cables, folded according to this axis" (Figure 4.9).

Motro (2003). Tensegrity: Structural Systems for the Future


Circuit compressed components = polygons of struts = circuit

Motro (2003). Tensegrity: Structural Systems for the Future


Motro (2003). Tensegrity: Structural Systems for the Future


Motro (2003). Tensegrity: Structural Systems for the Future


ZigZag "A type Z 6 tensegrity system (or 'Zig Zag' tensegrity system) is such that between the two extremities of each strut there exists a totality of 3 non aligned cables". These three cables then do indeed form a "Z".

Motro (2003). Tensegrity: Structural Systems for the Future


Motro (2003). Tensegrity: Structural Systems for the Future



Prospects “If, until now, two kinds have been developed- namely cellular units (or elementary cells) and their assemblies - we know that current developments concern complex tensegrity systems without an identified constitutive cellular unit. That is why this chapter is more a historical typology study than a prospective one, since we think that design procedures will lead to new possibilities.” - Motro, R., 2016. Tensegrity. London: Kogan Page Science.


MATERIALS


TENSILE COMPONENT / TENDON SYNTHETIC POLYMER STRINGS / TWINES NYLON ●

● ● ●

Nylon is a generic designation for a family of synthetic polymers known generically as polyamides, first produced by Dupont in 1935. Nylon is one of the most commonly used polymers. Nylon stretches about 10-15% under a load Used in light models only. Snelson used nylon in his original X-shaped tensegrity sculpture, “X-Shape” (1948)


TENSILE COMPONENT / TENDON SYNTHETIC POLYMER STRINGS / TWINES DRACON ● ● ●

Dracon, a polyester fiber, stretches only about 3.5-5% so it is preferred to nylon. R.B.Fuller preferred Dacron for his models. Dacron is also known as Terylene, Duron, Fortrel, A.C.E., and Kodel.


TENSILE COMPONENT / TENDON SYNTHETIC POLYMER STRINGS / TWINES KEVLAR ● ●

Kevlar stretches about 1-2% or less. Kevlar is several times stronger than steel, but it’s not durable when bent sharply, so it is not suitable for tensegrities where the tendons bend around a strut-end. Unsuitable for Kevlar fiber


TENSILE COMPONENT / TENDON SYNTHETIC POLYMER STRINGS / TWINES POLYESTER ●

Polyester is made of purified terephthalic acid (PTA) or its dimethyl ester dimethyl terephthalate (DMT) and monoethylene glycol (MEG). Comes in a wide variety of different colors and thicknesses (>1mm) Polyester is only slightly stretchable


TENSILE COMPONENT / TENDON SYNTHETIC POLYMER STRINGS / TWINES SPECTRA ●

● ● ●

● ●

Spectra is an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fiber that yield very high strength. Spectra stretches about 1-2% or less. Stronger than Kevlar and accepts bending. Good abrasion resistance, in some forms even 15 times more resistant than carbon steel Deforms slightly under a heavy load Make cut resistant ropes


TENSILE COMPONENT / TENDON ROPES POLYETHYLENE ROPES ● ●

Cut resistant ropes Resistant strength equal to steel cables at 1/10 their weight


TENSILE COMPONENT / TENDON BANDS RUBBER BANDS

● ● ●

Mostly manufactured from natural rubber, which are polymers of organic compound Isoprene Non-biodegradable Heating causes the contraction, and cooling causes expansion Produce heat when stretched, cool down

PLASTIBANDS

● ● ●

Made from latex free polyurethane “Green” product Better elasticity than rubber bands


TENSILE COMPONENT / TENDON STEEL WIRE ROPES / CABLES ● ● ●

Wire rope is composed of individual wires that are twisted to form strands. The strands are then twisted to form a rope construction. Coated with a weather or moisture resistant coating, such as nylon or PVC. Core ○ Fiber cores are made of vegetable (sisal, etc.) or synthetic (polypropylene, etc.) fiber and offer more elasticity ○ Independent wire rope cores offer more support to the outer strands and have a higher resistance to crushing and heat. Independent wire rope core also has less stretch and more strength.


Configurations ○ Regular lay The strands pass from left to right across the rope and the wires in the rope are laid in opposite direction to the lay of the strands. However, this rope type has great internal stress during winding and its wearing effect is concentrated on one wire => the most common and offers the widest range of applications for the rope. ○

Lang lay The wires are twisted in the same direction as the strands. These ropes are generally more flexible and have increased wearing surface per wire than right lay ropes. Internal stress is reduced making it less prone to fatigue from bending. Though the wires are more susceptible to pinching and kinking. =>Construction applications involving straight push/pull movement


Cables in prestressed structures: ○ Stay cables (P.1,3) A stay cable is a steel cable that is used to stabilize the mast in response to the forces created by wind loads. The stay cables are used to resist movement of the structure relative to the earth. One end will typically connect to the bridge’s mast, the other to the to a sturdy footing anchoring the the mast (via the cable) to the ground. ○ Catenary cables (P.2) A catenary cable is the steel cable that runs through the pockets on the perimeter of a tension structure fabric. The shape of the cable follows that of the pocket, which is typically curved with a ratio of 1:10 P.2: Tensile membrane lined with cables

P.3: Cable anchor structure

P.1: Stay cable footing (1

(3)


TENSILE COMPONENT / TENDON STEEL INOX ● ● ● ●

Stainless steel Commonly used for sculptures Durable Sleek, pairs well with aluminium struts “Dancing Devil” 1975, Kenneth Snelson


TENSILE COMPONENT / TENDON STEEL

SPRING ●

A spring is an elastic object made of hardened steel, phosphor bronze, titanium for parts requiring corrosion resistance or beryllium copper for springs carrying electrical current When deformed from its free state, the spring stores energy in the form of elastic potential energy, which releases when the spring is freed. For Energy Storage in Biological Tensegrity research


TENSILE COMPONENT / TENDON STEEL

CHAINS ● ●

D.G.Emmerich’s preferred tensile components Chain links can act as the structure’s nodes (Fig 2)

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3


MATERIAL COVER

PVC-COATED POLYESTER MEMBRANE

● ● ● ●

excellent strength & flexibility, durability water proof properties, transparency recyclable


MATERIAL COVER (PLEXIGLAS® GS) ACRYLIC GLASS SHEET MEMBRANE

● ● ● ● ● ●

Durable Weather resistant Translucency: 7% 15% Reflects: 68%-75% Diffused light, glare-free low coefficient of friction, easy to clean


COMPRESSIVE COMPONENT / STRUT METALS carbon steel High 1.5%

Medium - 0.6%

Low 0.3%

● ●

Strong & hardest High resistance

● ●

Easy to cut & form Medium load bearing & toughness

Weldable at low temperature Low load bearing Most ductile Economical

● ● ●

stainless steel Contains 10-20% chromium as the main alloying element. ● High corrosion resistance. With over 11% chromium, steel is about 200 times more resistant to corrosion than mild steel.

galvanized steel Using Zinc in the alloying process, hence cheaper than stainless steel, but lower resistance to corrosion and weather and needs refurbishment.

Snelson (1969). Northwood



COMPRESSIVE COMPONENT / STRUT METALS aluminium Pure aluminum is a low-strength metal and consequently not suitable for building applications By combinating with alloying elements: copper, manganese, magnesium, zinc,... and specific production processes -> change properties ●

● ● ●

Extraordinarily light weight and strength, transmits conducted heat & reflects radiant heat Corrosion resistance Low maintenance Non-combustible

Snelson (2002-2003). Sleeping Dragon

Snelson (1969). Needle Tower II


COMPRESSIVE COMPONENT / STRUT ORGANIC MATERIALS bamboo Bamboo is a natural composite material with a high strength-to-weight ratio useful for structures. Cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin are the three major chemical compositions of bamboo, and they are closely associated in a complex structure.They contribute about 90% of the total bamboo mass. The minor components are pigments, tannins, protein, fat, pectin and ash.

● ●

● ●

Higher compressive strength than wood, brick or concrete Can crack longitudinally in extreme dryness, can be treated using resin or wax on the surface to increase longevity Abundant & renewable Light & pliable

Brooks, 2021. Antepavillion, London. https://www.bambooimport.com/en/All-Along-the-Watchtower


BAMBOO + TENSEGRITY / MARTIN BASIGALUP




COMPRESSIVE COMPONENT / STRUT ORGANIC MATERIALS wood Wood is one of the most used natural building materials in the world.Wood is an organic, hygroscopic and anisotropic material. ● ● ● ●

Low heat conductivity Small bulk density Relatively high strength Amenability to mechanical working

StructureMode, Sanvito (2016) Tension Pavillion, London, UK


NODES STAINLESS STEEL


material conveying emotions ● ● ● ●

Strong but slender Lightness Futuristic Connecting inside and outside



conveniences ● ● ● ● ● ●

Lightweight & resistance Deployable => Economical + Sustainable Design and construction tools are developing Dramatic aesthetic effect Available materials High Stiffness-to-mass Ratio

Pavillion, roof, tents, construction details


obstacles ● ● ●

Limited load bearing + response and Strut congestion in relation to size Complex fabrication structures Inadequate construction tools

No large-scale construction with pure tensegrity structures, yet.

Youtube.com [online] Available at: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0YCO0yOL8U&t=271s>


applications Architectural and civil engineering: domes, roofs, tents, pavilions, bridges, envelopes… Art and design: sculptures, furniture, industrial designs,...


CASE STUDIES


DOME / 1988 SEOUL OLYMPICS GYMNASTICS HALL


Architects: Space Group of Korea (gymnastics stadium); Dong Myeong Architects and Planners in join venture with Hong Ik University (fencing stadium) Engineer: Geiger, Gossen, Hamilton Engineers, PC (stadium domes) David H. Geiger, principal-in-charge, Paul Gossen, project manager; David Chen, project engineer/ computer operations Contractors: Ssang Yong Construction Co. Ltd.- (general contractor for gymnastics stadium); Korea Shipbuilding & Engineering Co. (general contractor for fencing stadium); Woo Chang Construction Co. (erection subcontractor for gymnastics and fencing stadium domes)


The wire-wheel system: "A cable dome contains vertical struts, ridge cables, diagonal cables and hoop cables(Fig.4). Cable domes mainly include two variations: Geiger's domes and spatially triangulated domes (Fuller‘s dome)"

Radial layout: - simplified flow of force -> the dome statically determinant. - feasible, low curves -> lower wind uplift, less drifting of snow, lower snow loads - minimal surface area -> reduce fabric costs.


sections

Carbon steel struts & tension ring Cast steel nodes 0.6-in. steel cable, made up of bundles of 7 wire prestressing tendons Reinforced concrete compression ring


sections


plan The ridge and diagonal cables separate the roof into sixteen equal segments. Segments are of equal hoop spacing, equal loading on tributary areas and corresponding vertical geometry, the corresponding members of cable domes of different diameters carry the same load as one moves from the center of the dome outward.

height

29.4 m

span

120 m

membrane covered area

11 310 m²

building area

14 016.8 m²


construction October 1983

Design period

— November 1984

August 1984 waterproofed fiberglass fabric carefully sealed at its construction seams.

on the ground, the tension ring and 16 ridge cables that are made by threading 0.6-in. steel cable

— May 1986

Construction period.


Lower Casting with Hoop Cables being spun at grade

Fabric Covering



Columbia.edu. n.d. Seoul: Construction. [online] Available at: <http://www.columbia.edu/cu/gsapp/BT/DOMES/SEOUL/const.html>.


Fabric under load

The dome weighs in at 2psf = 95,76 Pa = 0.095 8 kN/m²


The membrane that covers the dome comprises four independent layers. The outermost is a high-strength fiberglass fabric with a silicone coating on both sides. Beneath this is an 20 cm insulating layer of fine, silky fiberglass enclosed in polyester bags. 15 cm beneath the insulation is a Mylar vapor barrier. 61 cm below the Mylar is a silicone coated acoustic liner made with an open-weave, fiberglass fabric. The thermal performance of the membrane system is R10; its overall light transmission is 6 percent, which enables the sun to meet most daytime lighting needs.



2009 KURILPA BRIDGE / COX RAYNER ARCHITECTS BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA


GENERAL INFORMATION ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

Location Function Open Design architects Structural engineers Contractor Budget

: Brisbane River, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia : Cycle and pedestrian bridge : 4th October, 2009 : Cox Rayner Architects : Arup Engineers : Baulderstone : A$63 million


CONTEXT In 2009, the objective was set for architects and engineers to deliver the Queensland government a landmark pedestrian and cycle bridge equal parts: ● a significant link from the Queensland Gallery of Modern Art (GoMA) (P.1) in the South Bank Precinct to Tank Street in the Central Business District (P.2) ● “architecturally striking”, sympathetic and complementary to its location.

P.1: Queensland Gallery of Modern Art (GoMA), South Brisbane

P.2: Brisbane Magistrates Court, George street, Central Business District


CONCEPT

Cox Rayner architects conceptualized a tensegrity chain placed along the span of bridge: a bold fusion of art and science featuring a striking array of masts, cables. The tensegrity system create a synergy between balanced tension and compression components to create a light structure which is incredibly strong.


Kurilpa Bridge is the world's largest hybrid tensegrity bridge with a multi-mast, cable-stay structure based on principles of tensegrity and a looped South end ➔

The bridge received accolades upon opening such as World Transport Building of the Year at the World Architecture Festival 2011.

Length (m) Main span

135m

Total Length

425m

Deck

235m

Width (m)

11m


PROGRAM The 425 metres long bridge features amenities like relaxation platforms, two rest areas, a continuous all-weather canopy for the entire length of the pathway. The bridge is lit with a sophisticated LED lighting system which can be programmed to produce an array of different lighting effects. Depending on lighting configurations, 75%-100% of the power required is provided by solar energy.


COMPONENTS ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

2 reinforced concrete piers 18 cross beam structural steel bridge deck 20 structural steel masts 16 steel horizontal spars 72 precast concrete deck slabs 86 stainless steel nodes Spiral wound stainless steel cables Steel canopy


TYPOLOGY The Kurilpa bridge is a modified cable-stay inverted fink truss bridge (P.2) based the principles of the tensegrity mast system(P.1) ● ●

Masts, spars and cable not clashing in arrangement Flying spars supported only by cable (Pure tensegrity element)

P.1 Tensegrity mast

P.2 Inverted fink truss bridge

SECTIO N


1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Main masts spring from the main support piers, set inclined Major mast cables An array of minor secondary masts, set inclined at different angles Secondary mast cables Secondary cables connects with flying spars Section box frames for lateral support

Masts (Vertical)

Main

Material

Height (m)

Diameter (mm)

Fabricated tubular steel

30m

905mm

28m

610mm

23m

457-508mm

Secondary Spars (Horizontal)

Cables

Fabricated tubular steel Main (mast) Secondary (spars)

high strength spiral wound stainless steel

32mm 19mm


The tensegrity array of flying spars and cables that hovers above and fulfils the following functions ● Laterally restrains the tops of all the masts, preventing them from buckling sideways under the loads ● Suspends the canopy, allowing it to float above the deck with no apparent means of support ● Creating a stiff structure that can self-stabilize under load


DETAIL

Section box frames separate from deck support the canopy on the Southern loop


CONSTRUCTION Steel bridge deck structure construction starts from the North side. Precast concrete deck slabs are placed and secured to the steel structure by in-situ concrete stitch pours. The main masts are erected on the piers via cranes and held in place by bracings, the connected cables temporarily lax. South side loop and segment are in development as the Northern segment approaches. 2/2009

3/2009


As the two segments are developed to meet in the middle, tensed stay cables with steel footings anchor the masts to the bridge’s structure. Similar to the main mast, smaller secondary masts are erected via crane and held in place by bracing. 3/2009 Spars are connected to the non-anchoring-cables to be lifted off ground. Similarly floating polyhedron frames support the steel canopy along with section box frames.

4/2009

7/2009


Q&A


Hãy giải thích kỹ hơn về tính bền vững của Tensegrity Tensegrity (cấu trúc dây căng) được sử dụng chủ yếu trong các cấu trúc như cấu trúc mái vòm, tháp, mái của sân vận động, cấu trúc tạm thời cũng như lều. Ở những công trình này, kết cấu đòi hỏi một lượng vật liệu nhỏ gồm các thành phần chịu lực căng, thành phần chịu nén và các nút hoạt động với nhau để tạo thành một tổng thể linh hoạt dễ chế tạo trước, có khả năng vượt nhịp lớn và tính dễ uốn. Vật liệu thép có độ bền cao, sức chịu tải lớn và khả năng tái sử dụng nhiều lần phù hợp làm thành phần chịu nén. Hệ thống dây căng chủ yếu sử dụng cáp thép với đặc tính luyện kim tuyệt vời cho phép nó được tái chế liên tục mà không bị suy giảm hiệu suất và từ sản phẩm này sang sản phẩm khác.


Kết hợp với dây cáp thường là mái che bạt căng có chất liệu vải bạt với khả năng đàn hồi tốt, chịu lực kéo cao, dùng che phủ cho các công trình có diện tích lớn hoặc mang tính tạo hình nghệ thuật; các tấm màng sợi polyester được bọc PVC có giá thành thấp và độ bền trung bình khoảng 10 năm hoặc các tấm màng sợi thủy tinh phủ PTFE có độ bền vượt trội vào khoảng 30 năm, có sức chống chịu tốt hơn với các yếu tố tự nhiên (nắng, gió, mưa); tuy nhiên, đòi hỏi lao động lành nghề để lắp ráp.


Tiềm năng để cấu trúc này xuất hiện tại việt nam có cao hay không, trong khoảng bao nhiêu năm nữa thì sẽ được áp dụng phổ biến? Cấu trúc Tensegrity rất có tiềm năng được áp dụng phổ biến tại Việt Nam. Trong kết cấu mái, đã có Vườn thú công viên Đầm Sen tại thành phố Hồ Chí Minh là nơi tiên phong sử dụng kết cấu tensegrity trong hệ mái cao 30m và có diện tích 5000m2. (phải) Đồ án Hoa Sen Hà Nội là một nhà hát - trung tâm văn hóa do công ty Decibel Architecture thiết kế. Cấu trúc Tensegrity nằm ở lớp trong cùng của lớp vỏ công trình, nhằm tạo hiệu ứng hình học và ánh sáng đặc biệt. (dưới) Cấu trúc tưởng phức tạp nhưng có thể tạo ra, thay đổi, tính toán nhờ các thuật toán. Tính chất nhẹ và tối thiểu của các vật liệu giúp giảm chi phí và tác hại lên môi trường khi xây dựng và sử dụng. Hiện tại cấu trúc Tensegrity đã được áp dụng tuy nhiên chưa phổ biến và chưa có hiệu quả thẩm mỹ. Tuy nhiên ta có thể tin rằng trong tương lai gần sẽ có nhiều công trình khẩu độ khác nhau, phục vụ những đối tượng khác nhau có áp dụng cấu trúc Tensegrity trong thiết kế.


References [1] Motro, R., 2003. Tensegrity: Structural Systems for the Future. Kogan. [2] Yang Yu - architecture. n.d. tensegrity-membrane - Yang Yu - architecture. [online] Available at: <https://www.yang-yu.net/tensegrity> [3] Eshahashim.com. n.d. Tensegrity : system study. [online] Available at: <https://eshahashim.com/portfolio/tensegrity/>. [4] Tensegritywiki.com. n.d. Tensegrity. [online] Available at: <https://tensegritywiki.com/wiki/Main_Page>. [5] Rastorfer, D., 1988. Seoul: Structural Gymnastics. Architectural Record [online] Columbia.edu. Available at: <http://www.columbia.edu/cu/gsapp/BT/DOMES/SEOUL/s-struc.html>. [6] Geiger, D., Stefaniuk, A. and Chen, D., 1986. Shells, Membranes and Space Frames, Proceedings IASS Symposium, Osaka, 1986. Design and Construction of Cable Domes, Seoul. [online] Columbia.edu. Available at: <http://www.columbia.edu/cu/gsapp/BT/DOMES/SEOUL/s-desig.html>. [7] Vietnamproject.com. n.d. Dam Sen Aviary And Zoo | VIETNAM PROJECT. [online] Available at: <https://vietnamproject.com/dam-sen-aviary-and-zoo-p20.html>. [8] Decibel Architecture. n.d. Hanoi Lotus. [online] Available at: <https://www.db-a.co/work/hanoi-lotus/>. [9] Tensegriteit.nl. n.d. The X-Module. [online] Available at: <http://www.tensegriteit.nl/e-xmodule.html>. [10] Frac Centre -Vadeloire . n.d. Structure Autotendantes [online] Available at: <https://www.frac-centre.fr/_en/art-and-architecture-collection/emmerich-david-georges/structures-autotendantes-317.html?authID=66&ensembleID=622>. [11] Gómez Jáuregui n.d V. Tensegridad. Estructuras Tensegríticas en Ciencia y Arte. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, 2007. [12] Fuller, R.B. n.d Tensile-Integrity Structures, U.S. Patent No. 3,063,521, November 13, 1962. [13] Emmerich, D.G. n.d Construction de réseaux autotendants, French Patent No. 1,377,290, September 28, 1964


[14] Snelson, K. n.d Continuous tension, discontinuous compression structures, U.S. Patent No. 3,169,611, February 16, 1965. [15] Emmerich, D.G(1988) n.d Structures Tendues et Autotendantes, Paris: Ecole d'Architecture de Paris la Villette. [16] Fuller, R.B (1961) n.d “Tensegrity”, Portfolio and Art News Annual, No.4. pp.112-127, 144, 148. Also available in <http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/rbfnotes/fpapers/tensegrity/tenseg01.html> [17] Coplans, J. (1967) n.d "An Interview with Kenneth Snelson", Artforum, March 1967. pp.46-49. [18] Schnaider, A. (1977) n.d “Interview with Kenneth Snelson”, Nationalgalerie Berlin Exhibition Catalog. March-May 1977. Also available in <http://www.kennethsnelson.net/icons/art.htm> [19] Fuller, R.B. (1975b) n.d Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking, New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc. Also available in <http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/synergetics.html> [20] Burkhardt, R.W. (1994-2004) n.d A practical guide to tensegrity design, [on-line], Cambridge (USA) <http://www.channel1.com/users/bobwb/tenseg/book/cover.html> [21] Kurtz, S.A. (1968) n.d “Kenneth Snelson: The Elegant Solution”. Art News. October, 1968. Availabe at <http://www.kennethsnelson.net/icons/art.htm> [22] Snelson, K. Kenneth Snelson, [on-line], New York (USA). <http://www.kennethsnelson.net/> [23] Fuller, R.B. (1975b) n.d Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking, New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc. Available at <http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/synergetics.html> [24] Connelly, R. and Back, A. (1998b) Catalogue of Symmetric Tensegrities, [on-line], Cornell University, Ithaca (USA). <http://mathlab.cit.cornell.edu/visualization/tenseg/in_progress/short_top.html> [25] Archdaily n.d Kurilpa Bridge / Cox Rayner Architects with Arup [online] Available at: <https://www.archdaily.com/186214/kurilpa-bridge-cox-rayner-architects-with-arup?ad_medium=gallery> [26] Structurae.net n.d Kurilpa Bridge (Brisbane, 2009) [online] Available at: <https://structurae.net/en/structures/kurilpa-bridge>



Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.